203
systems. The two-layer systems offered better appearance and weathering resistance. However,
introducing an additional coating layer would also increase the VOC values of the entire coating
system if it contained solvent-borne materials. Therefore, it was necessary from the outset to
introduce water-borne solid colour basecoats in order that the VOC requirements could be met.
High-solid solid colour basecoats do not meet current requirements.
In the past, conventional automotive OEM clearcoats contained acrylic resins of average solution
viscosity and high-molecular, more reactive melamine resins. The application solid were 40 to
45 % by weight. The application solid were increased to 48 to 50 % by weight through the use
of low-viscosity acrylic and melamine resins. The use of HMMM resins can even push the solid
content up to 55 to 60 % by weight. However, in that case, it becomes necessary to use stronger
acids, e.g. sulphonic acids as crosslinking catalysts, and that has some disadvantages. These
clearcoats are in competition, mainly in Europe, with two-components clearcoats that contain
low-viscosity acrylic resins and aliphatic and cycloaliphatic polyisocyanate adducts as crosslinker
(see Chapter 3.8.3.4). Naturally, the application of such clearcoats requires two-component spray
equipment. However, these clearcoats feature greatly improved weathering and chemical resist-
ance in comparison to clearcoats crosslinked by melamine resins. Such two-component clearcoats
have application solid of 55 % by weight and more. Table 3.9.4 shows the compositions of various
clearcoats and the calculated solvent emissions.
While one-component, high-solid clearcoats are preferred in the USA, water-borne clearcoats have
been developed in Europe. Water-borne clearcoats offer more scope than high-solid clearcoats
for reducing VOC emissions, even though they still contain some cosolvents. One-component
clearcoats
[164]
and two-components clearcoats
[165]
have been developed as well. However, both
technologies have so far failed to conquer the automotive coatings market. The main reasons are
problems in application behaviour. They suffer from the tendency to form blisters (popping) dur-
ing drying and crosslinking due to the anomalous behaviour of water as a solvent (high evapora-
tion enthalpy). Studies on preventing popping through addition of specific additives have shown
that other film properties can be adversely affected, e.g. gloss and levelling. These are the very
properties that clearcoats are expected to meet very well.
If solvent emissions are to be totally prevented, one possibility is to use clearcoats containing liq-
uid film formers. Such compositions are then UV cured. However, even UV clearcoats have some
restrictions on use due to problems with application behaviour. These are:
•
inhibition of effective crosslinking by atmospheric oxygen
•
different radiation density on three dimensional objects
•
shadow zones and interior parts are not reached by UV light
No automobile plant has so far installed UV-curing in an automotive OEM application line. How-
ever, many trials aimed at overcoming the aforementioned problems are underway
[173]
.
Table 3.9.4: Compositions of the different clearcoats and calculation of solvent emission
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: