As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom

Sample IELTS Task 2 Essay answer

The gun debate is very popular with the media in certain countries, especially the USA. While the right to bear arms is written into the constitution of a country, there will always be those who believe that it is in the best interest of communities and the country as a whole to have an armed population, while other will claim that it adds to gun crime and deaths.
One of the main arguments against citizen being able to keep a gun in their home is the control of the sale of such arms to the population. Some people still consider it to be too easy to purchase a gun over the counter, even with identification and background checks which are now common. Another point commonly voiced is that if in fact a homeowner kept a gun at home, it may actually be used against them in the event of a break-in or similar event, therefore making the incident potentially even more dangerous than if the owner of the property was unarmed.
On the other hand, various experts have shown that the presence of guns is actually a deterrent and that how easy it is to purchase firearms has no real connection with the level of gun crime. As they explain, criminals do not generally buy their guns at the local firearms store – they obtain them illegally - and therefore no amount of legislation to tighten gun sales would prevent them from being armed. However, more stringent procedures would make it more difficult for ordinary citizens to arm themselves. Is this fair? It seems somewhat illogical and not really focusing on the problem which is that of armed criminals and not ordinary citizens with guns.
Personally, I believe that if the constitution allows you to be armed, then it is your decision to make. Given the choice, I would rather have a firearm in my home, just in case, rather than find myself face-to-face with an armed intruder and being defenseless. The police can rarely stop crime against homeowners – they are usually only called and appear after the event.

IELTS Writing Task 2: You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Write about the following topic: In many countries today, the eating habits and lifestyles of children are different from those of previous generations. Some people say this has had a negative effect on their health. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. IELTS sample Essay
Changes in lifestyle and eating habits are quite normal between generations. Many children nowadays eat food that their parents or grandparents did not. They also do many activities that are different. The view that these changes are not positive for children is widely held, but there is also solid evidence that the general health of children has been influenced, although this is generally not seen until later in life.
While the normal everyday diet of children nowadays may include many items which their grandparents consumed, such as frozen foods, prepackaged foods and other imported foodstuffs, they are not all necessarily unhealthy. Certainly, most children now eat less food which is bought and prepared freshly, some would say this is a direct result of everyone leading a much busier life than in the past, including children.
Another lifestyle factor which can’t be ignored is that of physical activity, or lack of it. Nowadays, many children are not as active as children in the past. Many people blame this on computer and video games and the growth of TV culture. While some people may not consider children playing outside or participating in sports to be very important, there are various health benefits from such activities which carry through to adult life and their health in the future.
A combination of fast-food and lack of physical activity in the early years of life does not bode well for a person’s health in the future. There is now evidence of the consequences of this combination in countries such as the USA where obesity and other conditions related to being overweight and not having a healthy, balanced diet are becoming a burden on the health services, some say even outweighing that of smoking related conditions in terms of the health resources being used to combat such cases.
Personally, I agree with the view that a more sedentary lifestyle and worse eating habits generally produces less healthy children, and subsequently adults. However, not all children are inactive nor consume vast amounts of junk food, however, it has become common enough to impact health services and worry governments.

Write about the following topic. City living in the 21st century is stressful and offers no advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. IELTS Sample Essay Answer

Urban populations continue to grow all over the world. This is due to many factors; however, I cannot agree with the statement that living in a city is stressful and offers no benefits. While some people may find the pace of city life not as relaxing as that of the suburbs or living in the country, in general the opportunities available in cities far outweigh any perceived disadvantages related to stress.
A city is able to offer its inhabitants a wealth of experiences, facilities and opportunities that are unavailable in other areas such as towns and villages. From health services, educational institutions, museums and concert halls to greater employment prospects and shopping opportunities; the scale of a city allows it to provide something for everyone’s tastes and interests.
People who were born in a city never question whether it is stressful or not, this is a perception of people who transition to a city from outside. Clearly there is more noise, traffic, and the hustle and bustle of city life might seem strange at first, and certainly more stressful than living in the country. However, this is simply a comparative perception. Those people who are born city dwellers would never complain that is it is too stressful.

Most cities also have parks and green zones, which serve two purposes. Firstly, they provide a quieter place for people to relax and enjoy a change of scenery, and secondly they provide noise reduction as the greenery literally absorbs some of the background ambient noise of the city. This provides a taste of nature within the city center – and an opportunity to de-stress, for those who feel they might need it.

Overall, in my opinion, the fact that a person living in a city can avail themselves of any service or facility and enjoy all the offerings within such a compact space is a far bigger advantage than any perceived level of stress associated with city living.
Write about the following topic. Some people believe that a society in which there is less difference between the earnings of the poor and rich members of society would lead to more people being happy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.

This is an interesting argument and a very long-running one also. It is an argument which seems to gather a lot of popular support especially when economies suffer financial setbacks as we have seen across the world in recent years. Should the rich become poorer or the poor become richer? The financial inequality in society always seems to be blamed, or at least brought to the front of discussions, when we experience economic problems.

Personally, I don’t think there is any one social model which has been proven to work completely successfully and produced a society where more people are happy. We can see examples around the world of socialism and Marxism which have produced great inequality between the ruling classes and the ordinary people. Free market capitalism on the other hand has also produced inequality; however, it has also provided the means of more upward social mobility than many other societal models.

To simply state that if poor people earned more or rich people earned less then more people would be happy is to over simplify the argument, and I do not consider that it would automatically lead to more people being happy in society. A much better goal is to enable opportunities for more people to earn more. After all, wealth is not finite. There is no pot of money which has to be divided equally between all people. People are capable of creating wealth, new wealth that did not exist before. This is the key to making more people happy in society if money is the unit of measurement to measure happiness.

Enabling and empowering more and more people to create their own wealth and wealth for others would surely produce a better and more balanced society than simply redistributing what is already in existence.
Write about the following topic. Industrial pollution has increased in many parts of the world. Some people believe the most effective solution is to tax the organizations that cause such pollution. Other people argue that there are alternative ways to control the situation. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words. IELTS Essay Sample Answer
While industries in some parts of the world are producing more pollution than before, in other parts of the world we are seeing a reduction in the amount of industrial pollution caused. This is in part due to stringent environmental policies as well as financial incentives to avoid excessive pollution, and also the result of cleaner manufacturing technology and processes.
While simply taxing offending companies or organizations may seem the easiest and most direct method of controlling the problem, it is not the only action which can help achieve a reduction in the overall amount of pollution created by industry on a worldwide scale.
Technology offers many potential solutions for cleaner industrial processes. This can be seen in the waste management sector with regard to landfill sites, and in many manufacturing sectors which now utilize cleaner methods than a few decades ago. Such changes coupled with additional treatment of potentially hazardous pollution have already helped industrial pollution to be reduced in some countries.
The disappearance of certain older industries in some countries, such as coal mining, along with cleaner energy generation using nuclear power or alternative energy sources such as solar, wind and tidal have also helped in reducing industrial pollution. Such developments will certainly continue to produce cleaner and more environmentally safer options in the future.

Personally, I consider it is important for governments and industry to work together to develop clean energy, industry and commerce which is sustainable and to ensure that any associated pollution is kept to a minimum. Certainly, taxing offenders is necessary as a penalty, but it is by no means the only strategy which needs to be employed to help keep pollution worldwide under control.