Uzbekistan Quality Job Creation as a Cornerstone for Sustainable Economic Growth
24
inflationary environment, the CBU’s recent increase in the refinancing rate
is thus a positive action. Concessional interest rates are, however, especially
problematic in such an environment and should be avoided. There is also
evidence
that institutional development, the emergence of a market economy,
and secure property rights help financial deepening in transition economies
(Hasan et al. 2009). If successful, the government’s intended reforms of the
administration and judiciary as part of the 2017–2021 National Development
Strategy will help financial development. Other
important measures would
be to (i) lower the current requirement of 125% collateral for loans, which
prevents many small and medium-sized enterprises from securing credit;
and (ii) introduce international accounting standards in order to attract
external finance.
14
In relation to privatization
of state-owned banks, the central economic
issue is not whether ownership is public or private, but how efficiently an
enterprise operates. Studies suggest that government-owned banks operate
less efficiently than private banks (Cole 2009; La Porta et al. 2002;
Sapienza
2004). There is also strong evidence that bank privatization in the Russian
Federation substantially boosted financial development and lowered
unemployment (Berkowitz et al. 2014). Similar success would very likely
occur in Uzbekistan. The government should thus consider privatizing at least
some of the state-owned banks.
The second priority area of future reforms should be to enhance competition
in the marketplace. As also suggested by
the International Monetary
Fund (2018), the government should take on an active role in reducing
monopolistic practices and abandon the use of any remaining price controls.
The latter have been used fairly extensively and have affected important
goods such as cotton, where growers’ prices have been held well below world
market levels.
Similarly, the prices of energy and water have been held below
opportunity cost.
Competition improves firms’ productivity levels and thus boosts economic
growth. Furthermore, it shifts labor to high-productivity firms, which in
turn results in higher wages (Beegle et al., 2012). Thus,
contrary to what is
often feared, increased competition not only leads to more but also
better
jobs. However, an integral part of this progress is a loss in low-productivity
jobs as productivity surges and monopolistic firms lose their market power.
The net effect on total employment may thus be negative in the short run.
Nonetheless, increased competition will soon pay off. There is empirical
evidence that such negative employment impacts are reversed within 1 year
(Beegle et al., 2012).
14
Chapter 4 addresses the issues of collateral and international accounting standards.