Chapter 16 Alienation, Estrangement, and Alignment
275 other except across a soccer field at Sam’s Saturday games. Dad has
overheard Mom and her new husband actively encouraging the child’s
resistance, demeaning him out loud. As a result, the parents are once
again back in court.
After hearing arguments and reviewing a neutral mental health
professional’s family systems evaluation, the court acknowledges both
that Mom and Step-dad are alienating Sam from his father and that
father’s drinking is part of the problem, as well. The court recongizes
that Sam needs a healthy relationship with each of his caregivers unim-
peded by the adults’ self-serving conflict and therefore orders:
1. A parenting coordinator (PC) be hired to oversee this plan and to
assist the three coparents to resolve their child-centered differences.
The PC will have the privilege of receiving information from each
of the subsidiary professionals at his or her discretion. The PC will
deliver updates to the court every 3 months.
2. Dad will commence in individual psychotherapy and attend at least
three AA meetings each week, without exception. Any evidence
that he is consuming alcohol, inebriated, or otherwise impaired is
sufficient cause for the PC to interrupt this plan pending further
direction from the court.
3. Sam will commence individual psychotherapy. This therapy will be
protected from the parents’ and the court’s intrusion in order to
serve Sam’s social and emotional needs. Both parents will actively
support this therapy and will comply with the therapist’s requests
and recommendations.
4. A reunification therapist will be hired to facilitate the father–son
relationship. This therapist will conduct initial interviews separately
with each of the parents and with Sam and then will deliver a
proposal as to how best to proceed, to be submitted to the PC for
implementation.
5. A coparenting educator will meet with the three adults on a time-
limited basis to (a) educate them about the effects of alienation, (b)
facilitate respectful, child-centered communication, and (c) improve
parenting consistency between the two homes.
6. A hearing will be conducted in 9 months, at which time the PC will
report on the progress of these interventions and particularly on the
status of the father–son contact. At this time the court will entertain
motions defining proposed schedules of father–son contact based