stone cannot jump into the air at will: it is necessary for
something to throw it
up. In the same way a man needs something to give him a shock, and then he
will develop exactly as much energy as the shock (or preceding shocks) have
imparted to him - and not a whit more. This is what positivism teaches.
From a
LOGICAL STANDPOINT
this theory is more correct than the theory of
two kinds of actions:
RATIONAL
and
IRRATIONAL
. At least it establishes the
principle of the essential
UNIFORMITY
. Indeed, how is it possible to suppose
that
in a large machine
some parts
move according to their own wish and
judgment? It should be either one or the other. Either all parts of the machine
possess a realization of their function and act according to this realization, or
all of them are worked by the same motor and are brought into motion by the
same driving belt. The enormous service rendered by positivism is that it has
established this principle of uniformity. It remains for
us to determine in
what this uniformity consists.
The positivist view of the world asserts that the
beginning of everything
is
unconscious
energy,
produced by unknown causes at some unknown time.
Having passed through a long series of imperceptible electro-magnetic and
physico-chemical processes, this energy manifests itself for us in visible and
tangible motion, then in growth, i.e. in phenomena of life and
finally in
psychological phenomena.
This view has been examined already and the conclusion drawn that it is
quite impossible to regard physical phenomena as the cause of
psychological
phenomena,
whereas psychological phenomena, on the contrary, often serve
as an indisputable cause of physical phenomena observed by us. The
observed process of psychological phenomena arising
under the influence of
external mechanical shocks does not in the least mean that physical
phenomena originate the psychological ones. They are not the cause but
merely the shock upsetting the balance. In order that external shocks should
provoke psychological phenomena an organism is needed, i.e. a complex and
animated life. The cause of psychological life lies in the organism, in its
animation which may be defined as the potential of psychological life.
Moreover, from the
very essence of the concept
motion,
i.e. the basis of the
physico-mechanical world, we have drawn the conclusion that motion is not
at all a self-evident truth, that the idea of motion arose in us from the
limitation and incompleteness of our sense of space (the slit through which
we observe the world). And we have established that
the idea of time is not
deduced from observation of motion, as is usually supposed, but the idea of
motion results from our sense of time - and that the idea of motion is quite
definitely a
function of the time-sense
which, in itself, is the limit or the boundary of the space
sense of a being of a given psychological make-up. It has also been made clear that the
idea of motion could have arisen from the comparison of two fields of vision. And
generally the whole analysis of the fundamental categories of our
perception of the
world - of space and time - has shown that we have no grounds whatever for regarding
motion as a basic principle of the world.
And if this is so, if it is impossible to assume the existence of an unconscious
mechanical motor behind the scenes of the world's structure, one is forced to suppose
that the world is alive and intelligent. Because either one or another thing is true: either
the world
is mechanical and dead, 'accidental', or it is alive and animated. There can be
nothing dead in living nature, just as there can be nothing alive in dead nature.
After going through a long period of unconscious and semi-conscious existence in
the mineral, vegetable and animal kingdoms, nature attains its last great development
in man, and asks itself:
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: