by eliminating steps or goals. Consider
quick reference guide at their desks.
your students to complete. This can help
(
29
)
the writing task. This will help you plan
for strategy instruction.
• Simplify writing by thinking of it as the sum
of many components. Recognize that writ-
ing can be broken into manageable steps.
• Understand that writing is not always a
complex report or long essay. Shorter writ-
ing assignments can offer valuable learn-
ing opportunities to students as well.
• Join or develop a supportive group with
other teachers where you share your chal-
lenges and successes with your writing
and writing instruction. Group members
can provide feedback and support to one
another.
• Share your writing with your students,
including your challenges. Students may
experience similar challenges and find it
useful to listen to you model your thought
processes and solutions.
• Continue to expand your writing instruc-
tion knowledge and skills by participating
in professional-development activities,
observing other teachers during writing
instruction, and/or developing and obtain-
ing feedback on a plan for teaching writing
in your class.
Obstacle. 1.4. I model the use of rubrics for
my students, but my students’ self-assessments
aren’t accurate.
Panel’s advice. Students may not under-
stand key text features well enough to make
accurate judgments about their own writing.
Generally, students who achieve higher-rated
compositions tend to have more awareness of
the strengths and weaknesses of their writing,
whereas students whose compositions score
lower tend to have less awareness.
50
Consider
the following approaches for improving stu-
dents’ self-assessments:
• Model the use of rubrics by taking two
pieces of student writing from a previous
year, one an exemplar of effective writing
and one an exemplar of ineffective writing,
and annotate each piece using a rubric. If
the rubric measures several aspects, con-
sider limiting the modeling to one attribute
at a time to help make the rubric criteria
more concrete. Students can then annotate
each other’s writing in pairs.
• The rubric criteria may change, depend-
ing on the discipline or purpose for
writing. Ensure that students recognize
these changes and complete their self-
assessments with these differences in
mind. Discuss as a class how aspects of
the rubric are specific to the discipline,
audience, or purpose.
• Have students complete a rubric prior to
submitting a writing assignment. During
their review of the assignment, teachers
can complete the same rubric side-by-side
with the student’s. Teachers can meet
with students individually to discuss any
discrepancies in the evaluations. Students
can also review both rubrics, summarize
the differences, and plan for how they
might revise the assignment based on
both evaluations.
• After a specific writing assignment, ask
each student to rate his or her confidence
that the composition will receive a high
mark for one facet of the composition
(e.g., character development). Then, pair
students and ask them to evaluate each
other’s compositions for the presence of
character development. After the evalua-
tion, have each student again rate his or
her confidence that the composition will
receive a high mark. The focus on a par-
ticular feature, the peer evaluation, and the
final rating of confidence requires students
to think about how well they accomplished
the specific feature and to be more aware
of the features present in their writing.
• Assess the degree to which students have
confidence in their own self-assessments by
asking them to rate their confidence in their
rubric evaluations. For instance, a teacher
can ask students to write by each section of
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: