Stry of higher and secondary specialized education of the republic of uzbekistan national university of uzbekistan

THE MINISTRY OF HIGHER AND SECONDARY SPECIALIZED EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF UZBEKISTAN
named after MIRZO ULUGBEK


ENGLISH PHILOLOGY DEPARTMENT

Speciality: 5120100 - Philology and teaching languages (English)

HUSANOVA SHOHSANAM BOTIRALI KIZI

On the theme: “Contrastive study of antithesis in English and Uzbek”

COURSE PAPER


Scientific adviser:
A.K.Dadajanova


TASHKENT 2022


O’ZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI OLIY VA O’RTA MAXSUS TA’LIM VAZIRLIGI
MIRZO ULUG’BEK NOMIDAGI O’ZBEKISTON MILLIY UNIVERSITETI


INGLIZ TILSHUNOSLIGI KAFEDRASI

5120100 – Филология ва тилларни ўқитиш (инглиз тили) таълим йўналиши

HUSANOVA SHOHSANAM BOTIRALI QIZI

“Ingliz va o’zbek tillarida antitezaning chog’ishtirma o’rganilishi” mavzusidagi

KURS ISHI


Ilmiy rahbar:
A.K. Dadajanova


TOSHKENT 2022

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………….			3
CHAPTER I	STYLISTICS AND LEXICAL – STYLISTIC DEVICES………………………………………….		5
1.1	Stylistics and types of stylistics .………...…………		5
1.2	Lexical-syntactical stylistic devices .…………….…		16
CHAPTER II	PECULIARITIES OF THE ANTITHESIS IN THE LITERARY TEXT …………………………		20
2.1	The usage of antithesis as a literary device …………		20
2.2	Comparison of Pragmatic Value of Antithesis in English and Uzbek ………………………………….		23
CONCLUSION ………………………….………….…………………			26
REZYUME……....……………………………………….……………			27
THE LIST OF USED LITERATURE …………………….…………			28

INTRODUCTION
In the light of the modern development of science, and in particular, the cognitive-discursive approach, it seems appropriate to conduct research and analysis of stylistic techniques from the point of view of new factors that were not previously taken into account in stylistics, which make it possible to consider stylistic phenomena taking into account various parameters.
The stylistic device of the antithesis is interesting in that its complex nature, it is not in vain that the antithesis is considered in the light of various scientific areas such as philosophy, logic, psychology, rhetoric, literary criticism, stylistics and causes a variety of interpretations. Speaking about the antithesis, we take as a basis the definition that I.R.Galperin developed at one time, considering the antithesis as a stylistic device for contrasting verbal images that are contrasting in nature, revealing the contradictory essence of the designated or incompatibility of various objects and phenomena.
As Galperin I.R. notes, in order to create a contrasting characteristic of the described phenomenon, this phenomenon is often compared with another, which is logically opposite to it. Such a comparison reveals not the common features of objects and phenomena, but opposite, antagonistic features. The facts of objective reality do not converge on common grounds, but repel each other.¹
The actuality of the paper is that learning the identification of the antithesis as an effective stylistic device of the language, the correct understanding of its functioning and the determination of its place among other stylistic devices is based on the analysis of the linguistic nature, linguistic essence of the antithesis.
The object of the research is the usage of antithesis.
The subject of the research is the most characteristic functions performed by the antithesis and its interaction with other stylistic devices.
The aim of the course work is to analyze and compare main features of antithesis in Uzbek and English literary texts.
The tasks of this work:

• 
  to learn the notion of antithesis as a stylistic device;
  
• 
  to define the theory of semantics;
  
• 
  to disclose the role of antithesis in English;
  
• 
  to investigate the usage of antithesis in English and Uzbek;
  
• 
  to analyze the lexical and semantic features of antithesis in English and Uzbek.
  

The methods of investigation used in this paper are descriptive, comparative methods in order to reveal particular features of antithesis in English and Uzbek.
The theoretical and practical value of the work is that the facts, data, researches and information can be used in further inquiry in the field of semantics, lexicology, general linguistics and the present work is a valuable manual for specialists concerned with general linguistics, lexicology, stylistics and linguo-culture; additionally, its result can be used during the process of conducting English practical lessons and seminars.
The structure of the course work is introduction, two main chapters, conclusion, resume and the list of used literature.