When dealing with biological information, the question at hand often relates to the ability
to separate a pool of data into different groups. This may be a simple two-way split, for
example between people who do or do not have a disease, or it may involve many more
data categories. Sometimes, however, the number of groups may not be known and it may
not even be appropriate to think in terms of rigidly defined groups. Rather, it might be
better to first determine the most discriminating features that separate the data and then
investigate afterwards whether groups are present, and if so how many. Any kind of
discrimination exercise naturally requires some form of information on which a judgement
DNA sequences. Implicit in this sort of analysis is the notion that units of data are being
separated, but each unit may relate to several pieces of information. For example, if a unit
of data corresponds to a person they may be diagnosed by several different parameters and
Whatever the situation and type of data, sometimes the question being asked tries to
place each unit of data in one group or another, where there is no possibility of something
being in more than one group. Naturally, whether this is a valid assumption will depend on
context and the formulation of the problem. In reality, a hard boundary between groups
might not actually be as useful as a more fuzzy membership. Referring again to the
problem of diagnosing a condition in people using experimental test results, it may be that
two people with identical test results have different outcomes; there may not be a simple
dividing line between groups. We may have official values to distinguish between
‘underweight’, ‘normal’ and ‘overweight’ people to help guide healthcare, but of course it
is a continuous scale, so it may be sufficient to merely separate people (e.g. using height,
weight and gender information) and be able to make more flexible decisions, not based on
rigid categories.
Where there are discrete groups, identification and classification will sometimes be
based on rich, well-studied data, e.g. people who definitely do or do not have a condition,
but the groupings may then be used to make predictions with more limited information,
where there is no certainty. In such situations, it may be appropriate to approach the
classification of a unit of data, within one group or another, in a probabilistic manner.
While
Chapter 21
deals with
the concept of probability, here we focus on the process of
separating data, in terms of both making groups and determining the most discriminating
information. We refer to the formation of discrete groups by bringing together units of
data as clustering, and use discrimination to mean how we find the best combination of
the different kinds of data feature to perform separation.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: