60
Even in a modern organization this task – though not so obvious already – remains one of
the most important tasks. The leader has to direct collective’s emotions in the correct channel,
create an atmosphere of friendliness and skillfully fight negative spirits. This task is equally
important for leaders of any level – from the board of directors meeting hall to the shop-floor.
Simply speaking, the leader possesses the maximum possibility of influencing every
collective member’s emotions. If people
are instilled with enthusiasm, work productivity may
increase nearly instantly; and if people are irritated and offended on purpose to unsettle them, the
matters might just come to a standstill. This regularity indicates another important aspect of
emotional leadership: its influence is not limited by only the guarantee of good work
performance. People are attracted to a leader, expect emotional support from him, look for his
compassion. Anyway, leadership as such contains just this aspect.
No matter who
the groups emotional leader is, (s)he in all probability possesses the
capability of playing the role of limbic “gravity center” causing a considerable impact on
emotional state of the people surrounding him/her. Watch, for instance, a gifted actor at work,
and you will see how easily he draws the audience into his emotional orbit. Be it sorrows of
treachery, or joy of a triumph that he communicates – the audience
experiences the same
feelings.
That is why the ease with which we adopt a leader’s emotional state depends on how
emotional their faces, voices, and gestures transmit their feelings. The better a leader masters the
art of expressing his/her emotions, the better they will be the strength of their proliferation. The
transmission of feeling does not, of course, depend on leader’s stage skills. Because people listen
to him/her attentively, even slight emotions expressions may cause tremendous impact. But even
in these conditions, the more open leaders are – or, in other words, how openly they can express
their enthusiasm, – the sooner these strong feelings overtake other people.
Leaders with such talent act like emotional magnets, and it is quite natural that people are
attracted to them. Mind, with what kind of leaders people prefer working – they probably radiate
optimism. It is mostly to this effect that leaders with high emotional intellect attract talented
people – it is pleasant for gifted specialists to work in such environment. An on the contrary,
leaders with a negative charge – irritable, petulant, despotic, and cold – repulse people. Nobody
wants to work for a grumbler. It is confirmed by research that optimistic, captivating,
leaders
hold their employees easier than executives prone to bad moods.
61
A sincere emotional response doesn’t appear in reply to manifestation of leaders’ good
mood or their ability to say good words – it appears thanks to the whole set of coordinated
actions which are used by an executive. These actions form peculiar styles of leadership. As a
rule, effective leaders use one or a few leadership styles and skillfully switch from one to another
depending on situation.
Four of the six known styles of leadership – idealistic, teaching, companionate, and
democratic – are able to inflame, inspire people which leads
to productivity growth, while two
others – ambitious, and authoritarian – though needed sometimes, should be turned to, as we
shall show further on, with great care.
To understand how an organization’s emotional climate is influenced by different styles
of leadership, we used the global database on 3,871 executives. Specialists evaluated some key
factors influencing the working environment.
The research showed how the working climate having
been formed by different
leadership styles affected a company’s financial results – sales income, profit, effectiveness, and
profitability. The conclusions suppose that at any other equal conditions, leaders who used the
styles with positive emotional impact got higher financial results than those who didn’t followed
these styles. It is probable that in practice the leaders gaining the best results didn’t limit
themselves to only one specific leadership style. Most probably they used several styles
depending on situation, combining them harmoniously in various proportions.
Generally
speaking, the totality of leadership styles can be imagined like a sports-bag wit a set of golf-
clubs. In the course of the game the club fitting best for the necessary strike is selected and taken
out from the bag. Sometimes a player has to thin his choice over, but usually (s)he acts
automatically. A professional feels in advance what (s)he has to do, quickly picks the necessary
toolout, and brings it into play. Wise leaders act in the very same way.
All these styles have been described more than once, though sometimes they were named
differently, but the novelty of the model of leadership we offer is that that we show which basic
skills in emotional intellect are necessary for each style. And the main thing, we have discovered
the cause-and-effect relation between an executive’s behavior and organization’s work results. In
other words, the research data enabled seeing the real impact of one or another style on the
organization’s climate and, consequently, on productivity. For executives
who day after day
struggle for improving financial results the information on this relation will be quite useful, for it
adds a needed “dose” of science to the most important craft of leadership.
62
Let’s view for a start the four styles of leadership which enhance emotional resonance,
and then turn to describing the styles which, to the contrary, cause much too easily dissonance if
applied untimely and inappropriately.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: