Протэк’21 ite’21

Список литературы: 
1.
Умаров Х.К. Принятие решений при обосновании усиления мощности 
железных дорог Узбекистана в условиях неопределенности исходной 
информации: дис. … канд. техн. наук: 05.22.06 / Х.К. Умаров. – Москва, 2019. 
– 171 с. 
2.
Умаров Х.К. Увеличение пропускной способности лимитирующего перегона 
линии Ангрен – Пап / Х.К. Умаров, Е.С. Свинцов // Известия. Петербургского 
университета путей сообщения. – 2015. – Вып. 2 (43). – С. 84–90. 
3.
Строительно-технические нормы. Железные дороги колеи 1520 мм. СТН
Ц-01-95. – М., 1995. – 87 с. 

---

181 
ПРОТЭК’21 ITE’21 
PROBLEMS OF OCCUPATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT IN RAILWAY 
INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES ON THE EXAMPLE OF JSC “RZD” 
Aliev O. T., Batirova M. M. 
Tashkent State Transport University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
The article is devoted to the ongoing stage of reforming the production activities of 
JSC «Russian Railways», which consists in the transition from a compensatory, costly 
model of labor protection management to a modern system of professional risk 
management. This approach, using the example of Russian Railways, is the main tentatively 
process for Uzbekistan Railways. 
At the current stage of reforming the production activities of Russian Railways, 
the currently operating occupational safety management system is developing 
towards a significant increase in its efficiency. The main problems that need to be 
addressed are: 

programs and measures designed to reduce the number of accidents and 
their consequences are developed; 

on the basis of undesirable events that have already occurred; 

without deep analysis and consideration of all causal relationships; 

the system and technology for assessing working conditions at a number 
of workplaces is insufficiently effective and reliable; 

the system of medical and preventive services for employees currently 
requires significant modernization. 
It is possible to solve most of these problems by reforming the labor protection 
management system, which consists in the transition from a compensatory, costly 
labor protection management model to a modern occupational risk management 
system, which makes it possible to implement preventive approaches to preserving 
the health of workers in production and reduce all types of costs associated with 
unfavorable working conditions. 
The purpose of implementing a professional risk management system is to 
transition: 

from the system of response to incidents and material compensation of 
adverse consequences to the system of assessment and management of professional 
risks and elimination of the causes of dangerous incidents on this basis; 

from the system of formal punishments of employees for non-
compliance with the requirements of the current legislation to the system of economic 
incentives for using safe work practices; 

from the status list approach to the provision of compensations to their 
determination based on the actual working conditions in the workplace; 

from an insurance system based on formal insurance rates, calculated 
according to averaged indicators for the type of economic activity, to an insurance 

---

182 
ПРОТЭК’21 ITE’21 
system based on individual rates determined by the actual values of occupational risk 
indicators. 
Modern methods that implement world experience aimed at studying the risks of 
occupational injuries and occupational diseases are already beginning to be 
introduced into the process of labor protection management in Russia, but are still 
poorly used. Nevertheless, the relevance of assessing professional risks for their 
further management is beyond doubt, since it is much more effective to identify 
potential risks, preventing the onset of undesirable events, rather than reacting to 
accidents that have already occurred. 
To implement such approaches, at the suggestion of CBT, JSC Russian 
Railways, in 2005, by order of JSC Russian Railways, a methodology was 
approved [1] developed by the Moscow Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Ecology, which was subsequently tested in the structural divisions of the Moscow 
Railway. The experience gained as a result of this has shown that it allows for risk 
assessment only at the level of departments, but does not make it possible to carry out 
a deeper analysis within the structural unit of the causes of industrial injuries in order 
to reduce the risks of its occurrence by targeted action of corrective measures on the 
highest risk values. 
In 2008, the Rostov State Transport University developed an addition to this 
method [2], which allows for a deeper analysis and risk assessment, but the analysis 
is based only on the data on the incidents of injuries and occupational diseases, the 
volume of which is small for a qualitative and in-depth study. (on average, the 
department has less than one accident per year). A similar approach is used in the 
methodology [3] developed by JSC ‗VNIIJT‘. The methodology makes it possible to 
analyze industrial injuries on the basis of an automated system using a database of 
accidents on the railway network [4, 5]. 
Thus, we can conclude that the existing methods, on the one hand, do not 
provide a comprehensive analysis of occupational risks, since they do not allow 
identifying those potential cases of industrial injuries that have not yet occurred, but 
the likelihood of which may be high, and on the other hand, do not allow fully or