Republic and Renascence
87
organic form, and functional metaphors and images. His poetry created a
new blend of lyrical, dramatic, and rhetorical elements. His art was at once
utilitarian and poetically motivated. In his best poems, he seemed to have
interfused Lorca’s spirit with Mayakovski’s craft . Nazım Hikmet was truly
Turkish
and remarkably universal, both a romantic and a rationalist. His
vast popularity in Turkey and elsewhere is a testament to a passionate man
who cared and dared in everything he did in life and art.
Out of despair and wrath against injustice and exploitation, Nazım
Hikmet always off ered poetic statements of faith and affi
rmation, confi -
dent “that we’ll see beautiful days / we’ll see / sunny / days.” It is regret-
table that simplistic rhetoric rears its head in parts of his massive output,
which, at its best, features the lyric and dramatic depictions
of the human
predicament without reducing it to economic plight.
His earlier poems, which launched free verse in Turkey, put an eff usive
lyricism at the service of Marxist ideals and made a synthesis of youth-
ful enthusiasm for the machine age, the mystique
of a socialist paradise
on earth, the rhetoric of journalistic verse, ruthless political satire, and
the lyrical outpourings of an incorrigible romantic soul. Th
e later poems,
written in and out of prison by an idealist whose spirit was never broken,
are oft en battle cries, but they occasionally betray self-pity and self-dra-
matization. By 1941, Nazım Hikmet was angry and vengeful: “Our cause
/ will be fulfi lled / alas! / drenched with blood. /
And our victory shall be
pulled out / like a nail / without mercy.” In a poem he wrote in 1931, he
described himself as “I, who am an ordinary proletarian poet, / with a
Marxist-Leninist conscience.”
Nazım Hikmet’s masterpiece,
Şeyh Bedreddin Destanı
(
Th
e Epic of
Sheikh Bedreddin,
1977), came out in 1936. It represents the culmination
of the best aspects of the poet’s art and is remarkably free of its weak-
nesses. Th
e epic is a lyrical and dramatic account of the uprisings of Şeyh
Bedreddin and his followers, including a young revolutionary named
Börklüce Mustafa, who in the early fi ft eenth century founded a religious
sect advocating community ownership, social and
judicial equality, and
pacifi sm. Nazım Hikmet tells how the Ottoman armies under the com-
mand of Royal Prince Murad crushed the uprisings, killed Börklüce Mus-
tafa, and later hanged Şeyh Bedreddin. Th
is work is a perfect synthesis of
substance and form, of diction and drama, of fact and metaphor. Bedred-
din and Mustafa are treated as tragic heroes whose
ideals are thwarted by
88
A Millennium of Turkish Literature
a cruel death. Fortunately for the poem, Nazım Hikmet’s ideological con-
cerns are woven into the action and lyric formulation. An elegiac tone,
fully attuned to the historical narrative, precludes
the intrusion of the
polemics and propaganda that had deleterious eff ects on Nazım’s other
major poems. Th
e epic is perhaps the best long poem written in Turkish
in the twentieth century.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: