Occidental Orientation
79
movement stood on its laurels, the
Fecr-i Âti
group
introduced new aes-
thetic principles based mainly on individualism and introspection. Th
e
members revealed Parnassian, symbolist, and impressionist infl uences.
Other notable groups included the
Nev Yunaniler
(Neo-Graecians)
poets and novelists, principally Yahya Kemal Beyatlı (1884–1958) and Yakup
Kadri Karaosmanoğlu, who incorporated into
their work many themes and
aesthetic values from the Greek and, to a lesser extent, Roman traditions.
Emerging as an alternative and in opposition to the
Nev Yunaniler,
another
group embraced the heritage of the entire Mediterranean basin and sought
to create a synthesis of the West and the East. Th
ey called themselves
Na-
yiler,
literally “Reed-Flute Players,” but fi guratively “Virtuosos of Music.”
Making melodiousness
a prime creative asset, they stressed the ideal of
“inner harmony” through Yahya Kemal Beyatlı’s infl uence.
Th
e closing decades of the Ottoman state witnessed an abundance of
translations and adaptations from Europe. Th
is period was also the heyday
of polemics and criticism. With great energy, the stage was set for the revo-
lutions that the young Republic of Turkey would launch.
81
Republic and Renascence
W
hen the Ottoman state collapsed aft er nearly 625
years and gave
way to the Turkish Republic in 1923, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
devoted his prodigious energies to the creation of a homogeneous nation-
state dedicated to modernization in all walks of life, vowing to raise Turkey
to the level of contemporary civilization (meaning the West) and higher.
In image, in aspiration, in identifi cation, the offi
cial and cultural estab-
lishment became largely Europeanized. Education was made secular, and
reforms were undertaken to divest the country of its Muslim orientation.
Th
e legal system
adapted the Swiss Civil Code, the Italian Penal Code, and
German Commercial Law. Perhaps the most diffi
cult of all reforms, the
Language Revolution, was undertaken with lightning speed in 1928, and
since then it has achieved a scope of success unparalleled in the modern
world. Th
e
Arabic script, considered sacrosanct as Koranic orthography
and used by the Turks for a millennium, was replaced by the Latin alpha-
bet. Th
is procrustean reform sought to increase literacy, to facilitate the
study
of European languages, and to cut off the younger generations from
the legacy of the Ottoman past. Atatürk also launched a “pure Turkish”
movement to rid the language of Arabic and Persian loanwords and to
replace them with revivals from old Turkish vocabulary and provincial
patois as well as neologisms. Reforms and all, the single common denomi-
nator of Turkish identifi cation has signifi cantly been the language. It has
provided for
social cohesion, cultural continuity, and national allegiance.
Although many of these sweeping reforms did not have a strong
impact in the rural areas until the latter part of the twentieth century, in
the urban centers drastic changes took place: the political system, religious
faith,
national ideology, educational institutions and methods, intellectual