275
The results of individual SEM analysis are initially presented prior to making a comparative
analysis.
5.13.1 Model Results --- Search Products
The model for search products exhibited a
χ
2
of 273.820 with df = 99, p < .01;
χ
2
/df = 2.766 <
5, GFI = .943 > .90; CFI = .950 > .90; TLI = .904 > .90; RMSEA = .062 < .08. All statistics
for this model were at the appropriate levels, except the RMR, which was .063 > .05.
Table
5.29 presents the results of testing the structural model (Figure 5.4) for the sample pertaining
to search products by providing the path coefficients between the exogenous and endogenous
variables, average variance accounted (AVA) for, T value and R
2
. All numbered hypotheses
contain an additional “s” which denotes the use of the sample pertaining
only to search
products in this analysis.
The AVA for the endogenous variables was .65 and the individual R
2
were greater than the
recommended .10 (Falk and Miller 1992) for all of the predicted variables. As all of these R
2
were larger than the recommended levels it was appropriate to examine the paths’
significance of the paths associated with these variables. The absolute value of the product of
the path coefficient and T value were used to evaluate the significance
of the individual paths
(Falk and Miller 1992). As displayed in Table 5.29, nine out of twelve paths met the criterion
of T value (greater than 1.96), which indicated that the nine paths had significant effects.
Further examination of the standardized path coefficients found that all nine paths were
significant in the hypothesized direction. Accordingly, H1b(s), H1c(s), H2c(s), H2d(s),
H3a(s), H4a(s), H4b(s), H4c(s) and H5(s) were supported. Nevertheless,
the results revealed
that three paths failed to meet the T value’s recommended level (above 1.96), which implied
that these three paths were not significant. Therefore, H1a(s), H2a(s) and H3b(s) were
276
rejected. Furthermore, the data showed that 92 per cent of the variance in consumer TCs was
explained by five antecedent variables (i.e., perceived Internet expertise,
online buying
frequency, e-service quality, reputation of online store, and perceived convenience), while
consumer TCs explained 64 per cent of the variance in customer satisfaction. In addition,
customer satisfaction and TCs accounted for 55 per cent of the variance in customer loyalty.
48 per cent of the variance in online purchase behaviour was explained by TCs.
The preceding SEM analysis of the proposed model for search products
provided support for
all but three hypotheses, which indicated that the proposed model received mixed support in
the context of search products. Figure 5.4 presents the proposed model for search products
showing all path coefficients and R
2
values for endogenous variables.