CHAPTER 8 – YABAN, KADRO, ANKARA
253
The view of Aydemir was that the people could not grasp a system of ideas. It was
beyond their everyday concerns.
Kadro
should aim at specific goals which the
people would be able to perceive and understand: “Hulâsa, inkılâp, halk için, fakat
halka rağmen bir harekettir”
40
. (In short, the revolution is a movement for the people
despite the people).
Kadro
supported state intervention in the economy and was against private initiative.
It was at that point when there were efforts to establish the İş Bankası that
Kadro
was shut down because it was seen as a threat. The state intervention promoted by
the Kadroists would have according to themselves characteristics special to the
Turkish nation and would not rely on the class struggle, on the clash between the
bourgeoisie and the working classes. It would be different from both the capitalist
and the socialist systems of other countries. The basis of this new system would be
founded on the hegemony of the people but without having to go through the stage
of capitalism
41
.
In order to fulfil the aims of the revolution (the
inkılâp
, the preceding
ihtilâl’s
goal
having been accomplished with the victorious outcome of the 1919-1922 war) the
leading role should be given to a class of intellectuals which would oversee the
application of the reforms
42
.
40
Karataş, 278-79, quoting Aydemir 2003, 446
41
İleri, Nazım, 101
42
Türkeş 1998, 95
CHAPTER 8 – YABAN, KADRO, ANKARA
254
The role of Yakup Kadri in
Kadro
is discussed extensively by Karataş
43
. Yakup
Kadri contributed to the periodical with 40 articles on culture and literature, two on
art and two on the economy. Despite the large number of articles scholars debate
whether Yakup Kadri was simply the proprietor of the periodical or whether he had
an influential role as well. Marxist scholars thought that he was only writing articles
on literature not related to Marxist ideology and a similar view is shared by Mehmet
Emin Uludağ. Birsen Talay argues that in some of his articles Yakup Kadri referred
to the political systems of Italy and Russia as examples to be followed when
appropriate, and so in parallel with his literary input to the periodical and to the
movement he definitely had a political one as well. This seems to be perfectly true.
In a rather surprising set of articles under the title ‘Ankara - Roma – Moskova”’
44
Yakup Kadri praises the Russian revolution for creating a revolutionary climate all
of its own and even more amazingly excuses the OGPU
45
because it inhibits foreign
contamination. Yakup Kadri was certainly associated with the ideological aims of
the Kadro movement which is why he was packed off to Tirana as ambassador when
Kadro
was shut down.
Ertan shared this view by pointing out the political purpose of the articles in which
Yakup Kadri strove to define and clarify the policies of the government. Ahmet
Oktay, by contrast, thought that Yakup Kadri’s role was not as influential because he
43
Karataş, 280-81 referring to: Uludağ. 2005, 50, Talay 2002, 438-439, Ertan 1994, 39 and 127-129, Oktay
2003, 339-343, Bostancı 1990, 9
44
Kadro
. 1932 , Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 37-40, No. 7 pp. 32-35, No. 9, pp. 34-38, No. 10, pp. 40-43, No. 11, pp. 38-40,
No. 12, pp. 33-5, 1933, Vol. 2, No. 13, pp. 29-31, No. 14, pp. 39-44, No. 15, pp. 32-35, No. 16, pp. 39-41
45
The Unified State Political Directorate. The same organisation was previously known as the Cheka and
subsequently as the KGB.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |