Subjects bring tribute to the Persian emperor in Persepolis. One of the four
Achaemenid capitals, Persepolis was the site of the annual Persian New Year
ceremonies every spring, when representatives from every province of the
empire brought gifts for the king. The site was destroyed by Alexander the Great
in 330
bce
.
Persepolis, Fars province, southwestern Iran, photo by author.
I r a n i n Wo r l d H i s t o r y
22
ongoing Greek-Persian political rivalry is that most of the subject popu-
lations occupying this never-ending battleground were neither Greek
nor Persian. Year after year, the farmers, craftsmen, and tradespeople
of Anatolia, Mesopotamia, Egypt, the Levant, and the Caucasus were
forced to provide services or give up their crops, daughters, and liv-
ing quarters to an endless rotation of occupying foreign armies. Tribal
nomads were somewhat better off, since they often constituted the
main fighting forces and could simply switch sides or go home.
Also, the lines between the Greek and Persian armies were not so
clearly drawn. Greeks were assigned governorships in some western
Persian provinces, and Greek soldiers and even commanders served in
the Persian army. During Xerxes I’s invasion of Greece, some two-thirds
of the Persian army was made up of Greek mercenaries. More impor-
tant, not all Greeks and not all Persians were soldiers and occupiers;
many were simply settlers who integrated over time into local society
and were as much victims of the winds of war as anybody else.
A modern
fravahr
(the most recognizable symbol in Zoroastrian religious
iconography) is displayed above the entryway to a Zoroastrian fire temple in
Mumbai, India. In ancient times the figure within the winged disk, borrowed
from Assyrian art, symbolized the Zoroastrian supreme deity, Ahura
Mazda. Contemporary Zoroastrians, shunning idolatry, consider it to be a
representation of the human spirit. During the twentieth century, the
fravahr
became a symbol of Iranian nationalism and is frequently used in jewelry,
clothing, wall hangings, and even bumper stickers by Zoroastrians and
non-Zoroastrian Iranians alike.
Photo by author
.
I r a n a n d t h e G r e e k s
23
As common inheritors of the patriarchal Indo-European tradi-
tion, neither the Persian nor the Greek male elites had much to say
about women, and what they did say was usually not positive. The
Persepolis fortification tablets provide some information about women
workers: in unskilled professions they were allotted one-third less food
rations than men, although for skilled workers the rations were equal;
new mothers were given extra rations, but more if they had boys. Royal
Persian women could own estates and employ laborers, but in the
Greek sources they are mainly portrayed as ambitious schemers insti-
gating court intrigues. The practice of incestuous marriages among the
Persian royalty, first noted by Herodotus during the fifth century bce,
is condemned as unnatural by Western writers and sometimes used
for ridicule. For example, the first-century bce Roman poet Catullus
insults a rival with the words, “May a Magus be born of the abomina-
ble union between Gellius and his mother, and may he learn the entrail
divination of the Persians!”
5
An extraordinary Iranian woman by the name of Mania served
briefly as satrap of the province of Aolis in western Anatolia at the end of
I r a n i n Wo r l d H i s t o r y
24
the fifth century bce. The Athenian writer Xenophon describes her rule
as characterized by “magnificence” (that is, royal generosity), making the
apparently counterintuitive point that at least some women were actu-
ally capable of demonstrating this quality: “Whenever she came to the
court of Pharnabazus she brought him gifts continually, and whenever
Pharnabazus went down to visit her provinces she welcomed him with
all fair and courteous entertainment beyond what his other viceroys were
wont to do. . . . Nor was she sparing of her gifts to those who won her
admiration; and thus she furnished herself with a mercenary force of
exceptional splendor.”
6
Mania’s son-in-law, finding it outrageous that a
woman should hold such a high position, murdered her.
Subsequent female rulers of Iranian lands were rare and suffered
similar fates: short reigns and dismissive mentions by historians.
Alexander the Great’s Bactrian wife Roxana looms large in legend, but
the historical facts of her life are not particularly happy—she was at
least considered important enough to have to be murdered along with
her son, Alexander IV, so that the usurper Cassander could assume the
Macedonian kingship following Alexander’s death.
The nomadic steppe societies of the Sakas may have had a some-
what higher regard for women. Saka women participated in battle and
provided the source for Greek legends about fearsome “Amazon” war-
riors. According to Herodotus, the Sauromatian Sakas intermarried
with these Amazon women, and “Ever since then the women of the
Sauromatae have followed their ancient ways; they ride out hunting,
with their men or without them; they go to war, and dress the same as
the men.”
7
The Massagatae Sakas who defeated Cyrus the Great were
ruled by a queen, Tomyris (Tahmrayish); Herodotus lists their chief
deity as “Hestia”—his Greek equivalent for a goddess whose actual
Saka name is not known. In later centuries, the Turkic peoples who
gradually took over the place of the Scythians as masters of the steppe
also had strong female characters. Even to the present day, women in
the rural Turkic communities of Central Asia—particularly the Kyrgyz
and Kazakhs—are more publicly visible and active than in many other
traditional Islamic societies.
Weakened by years of infighting and court intrigues, the Persian
Empire proved unable to withstand the well-organized armies of
Alexander III of Macedon, known as “Alexander the Great” in
Western history (Persian sources, not surprisingly, call him “Alexander
the Accursed”). Although the entire process actually took twelve years,
the Macedonian advance, province by province, proved irreversible and
ended with the destruction of Persepolis in 330 bce. According to the
I r a n a n d t h e G r e e k s
25
Greek historian Diodorus Siculus, “The Macedonians spent the whole
day in pillage but still could not satisfy their inexhaustible greed. . . . As
for the women, they dragged them away forcibly with their jewels, treat-
ing as slaves the whole group of captives. As Persepolis had surpassed
all other cities in prosperity, so she now exceeded them in misfortune.”
8
Following a successful campaign into India, Alexander himself died
prematurely a few years later in Babylon in 323 bce. The Macedonian
conqueror left behind Greek garrisons throughout the empire, many
of them in newly built Greek-style towns he named after himself. At
least twenty Alexandrias were constructed throughout Western and
Central Asia, five of them in Afghanistan alone. (The present-day city
of Kandahar is a corruption of the original Greek name.) Much of
the Achaemenid administration he left in place, however, along with
a number of Iranian provincial governors. Alexander had been criti-
cized within his own army for adopting Iranian dress and customs, in
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |