[You will have to talk about the topic for one to two minutes. You have one
minute to think about what you're going to say.
You can make some notes to
help you if you wish.]
Model Answer 1:
I work at a multinational computer hardware manufacturing company in
Malaysia. Mr Andrew Peterson is my colleague and he appears the most
irritating person to me for some reasons. In fact, I have never met a person like
him before.
Mr Peterson is a man of less wisdom. He talks much and interferes in almost
everything that he listens regardless of importance to him. Many of my
colleagues are also irritated by him.
As an individual, he is good but for his
nosiness, he is disliked by everyone like me. But nobody can protest against
him because he is also the manager of the company where we are working. To
exercise his power and intelligence (!) he always is in search of seeking the
faults of others and wants to revise the faults. Besides, he always interferes
even into the personal matters of the employees
which are extremely
intolerable for us.
I met him first in the office. He was on the interview board. In fact, it was my
bad luck to meet a person like him. Before joining this hardware manufacturing
company, I used to work at another company that dealt with some specific
parts of the computer. I had some problems with the office schedule. They
asked me to join at the roaster duty. But it was not possible for me and I
politely informed them about my inability to
continue anymore with the
company. So, I started seeking jobs, especially a suitable one for me. It was my
regular task to seek the job until I get this one. I submitted my CV and they
asked me for a formal interview. I attended accordingly and got selected for
the post after a thorough interviewing process. Mr
Peterson was the chair of
the interview committee. I am grateful to him for selecting me but I had to
prove my worth against the post.
He is the manager of the manufacturing company in Malaysia. In fact, he is the
in-charge of the company that is headquartered in Canada. I admit that he is a
competent employee to care for everything but his nosiness is the most
irritating issue for the majority of the employee.
There are some staffs who
love to be with him and care for him for their own benefits, but I am unable to
be his shadow. I am also unable to nod at every of his statement and activities.
In fact, he tries to dominate everyone at the office. Mr Peterson wants to know
each and everything about the office. And most of the employees think this is
not fair for him. He is responsible for some specific tasks.
He is to care for the
weekly and monthly production and sales issues. Besides, he is also responsible
for taking care of the production house lest the production is up to the mark in
line with the demands of the market and more other duties.
But despite his responsibilities, he tries to do something more. It proves his
stupidity. For
instance, if someone has any family issue, he tries to interfere
there and provide a solution regardless of necessity. As a result, he has turned
into an irritating character in the office. Nobody
likes him anymore and only
maintains a minimal relationship with him. He could have been an interesting
person if he had avoided such snoopiness. He always tries to insult the
employees- both in direct and indirect manners. Being his subordinate, nobody
is able to protest fearing the ending of their jobs. The similar is with me. I am
talking about him here but it is not possible for me
to advise him to change his
attitude. So, he will remain an irritating person to me until I quit the job.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: