6 0 4
PA R T N I N E
T H E R E A L E C O N O M Y I N T H E L O N G R U N
c.
Do you think the growth of the Japanese auto
industry increased
or decreased the gap between
the competitive wage and the wage chosen by the
UAW? Explain.
10. Some workers in the economy are paid a flat salary and
some are paid by commission. Which compensation
scheme would require more monitoring by supervisors?
In which case do firms have an incentive to pay more
than the equilibrium level (as in the worker-effort
variant of efficiency-wage theory)? What factors do you
think determine the type of compensation firms choose?
11. Each of the following situations involves moral hazard.
In each case, identify the principal and the agent, and
explain why there is asymmetric information. How does
the action described reduce the problem of moral
hazard?
a.
Landlords require tenants to pay security deposits.
b.
Firms compensate top
executives with options to
buy company stock at a given price in the future.
c.
Car insurance companies offer discounts to
customers who install antitheft devices in their cars.
12. Suppose that the Live-Long-and-Prosper Health
Insurance Company charges $5,000 annually for a
family insurance policy. The company’s president
suggests that the company raise the annual price to
$6,000 in order to increase its profits. If the firm
followed this suggestion, what economic problem might
arise? Would the firm’s pool of customers tend to
become more or less healthy on average? Would the
company’s profits necessarily increase?
13. (This problem is challenging.)
Suppose that Congress
passes a law requiring employers to provide employees
some benefit (such as health care) that raises the cost of
an employee by $4 per hour.
a.
What effect does this employer mandate have on
the demand for labor? (In answering this and the
following questions, be quantitative when you can.)
b.
If employees place a value on this benefit exactly
equal to its cost, what effect does this employer
mandate have on the supply of labor?
c.
If the wage is free to balance supply and demand,
how does this law affect the wage and the level of
employment? Are employers better or worse off?
Are employees better or worse off?
d.
If a minimum-wage
law prevents the wage from
balancing supply and demand, how does the
employer mandate affect the wage, the level of
employment, and the level of unemployment? Are
employers better or worse off? Are employees
better or worse off?
e.
Now suppose that workers do not value the
mandated benefit at all. How does this alternative
assumption change your answers to parts (b), (c),
and (d) above?