Other, however, think that they should start earlier

Some people think that children should start formal education at the age of 7. Other, however, think that they should start earlier.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In some people’s opinion, children should begin attending schools before the age of 7 while I am of the opinion that they would benefit more from being educated when they are 7.
There are several reasons why early education can be of use to children. One of them is that it may facilitate faster learning. This is because fresher brains of children can absorb knowledge quickly and most of them are curious and eager to learn. Educators can take advantage of this. Another reason might be that children studying from an earlier age can have better chance for earlier career development. If, say, children start studying when they are 4, by the time they are 20, they will have finished higher education. The earlier they get into employment, the higher chances they can have at becoming financially successful.
Despite these arguments, education starting at 7 is even more significant for two key reasons. The obvious one is that generally children younger than 7 are not ready both physically and mentally to study. This is because younger children are not advised to sit in the same place for a long time as there are many changes that take place to their bodies. They also lack the sense of responsibility which is required for effective learning. Along with this/apart from this, younger learners can pose a huge problem for educators as well. The fact that it is difficult to keep children focused because of their playful behavior means the job of teaching them can become challenging. All these factors make education at the age of 7 a more attractive choice.

In conclusion, although there may be some cases where studying earlier seems to be effective, I still feel children should not begin their education until they are 7.

Some people say that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news through other sources better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In some people’s opinion newspapers are a better source of news than any other means while I believe other ways such as the internet is the best.
There are several reasons why newspapers can be one of good ways to be aware of current affairs. One of them is that most of them are reliable compared to other ways of spreading news. In other words, they are of non-profit organizations, which means that their main purpose is to make the public aware of news but not to make money. Another reason might be that most newspapers are professional. This is because, they often hire experienced journalists and editors to create the best content possible. By contrast, the same cannot be said about internet sources as news is mostly prepared by amateur bloggers.
Newspapers are reliable.
Most newspapers are of non-profit organizations.
Newspapers are more professional.
They hire experienced journalists and editors when preparing content.
Other sources are better such as the internet:

1. 
   Accessible: fast, free of charge
   
2. 
   News on the internet is often enriched by the means of pictures/videos/audios/links to other similar news.
   

The fact that I fell in the classroom made me embarrassed.
The fact that + SUBJECT VERB + MAIN VERB
The fact that you don’t go to school is strange

Why/how/what’s an example/what’s the result/Can I make comparisons?

Teacher: they should start at age of 7 because it is difficult to control very young children.

Children: we want to play more not study
Children are not ready both physically and mentally to start earlier:
Scientific perspective: start earlier thanks to faster learning.
Financial aspect: earlier career development.
INTRO:1) general topic : paraphrase

1. 
   synonyms/antonyms
   
2. 
   changing word formation
   
3. 
   change tenses.
   
4. 
   Logical paraphrase
   

2) your position: answer to the question.