Ministry of higher and secondary special education of the republic uzbekistan state world languages university

TOPICS FOR PRESENTATIONS

1. 
   Main classifications of word formation in compared languages.
   
2. 
   Functions of affixation in English and Native languages.
   
3. 
   Different ways of word formation in compared languages.
   
4. 
   Ways of compounding in English and Native languages.
   
5. 
   Word formation typology.
   
6. 
   Typology of aproductive way of word formation.
   
7. 
   Typology of thenon-productive way of word formation in English and Native languages.
   
8. 
   The role of thesemantic way of word formation in English and Native languages.
   

VI. Interrelation of Comparative Typology
with anthropocentric trends of Linguistics


6.1. Typology in Modern trends inLinguistics

Key points for discussion: Appearance of anthropocentric paradigm Understanding the term of “Cognitive science” Role of typology in modern trends of linguisitics

It is known that linguistics and variety fields of it were developed in every period of developing process. Hence, we can observe that in XVIII century, there were mostly done researches of comparative-historical investigations among related languages and in the last century collection of anthropocentric, functional, cognitive and dynamic paradigms occupied the position of structural paradigm. Movement of interests of researcher from the object of cognition to the subject in anthropocentric paradigm, with another word it can be understood the analysis of language in ahuman being and human being in language.

The anthropocentric paradigm is the last and modern scientific paradigm where the problem of human in language and language in ahuman being is analyzed, i.e. interrelation of human and language becomes the main object of linguistic researches. This paradigm appeared in the 30s of the XXth century with the linguistic works of American philosophers and linguists, and a number of great linguists all over the world developed it.List of areas are developing in the anthropocentric paradigm of the modern linguistics such as pragmatics, sociolinguistics, ethnolinguistics, psycholinguistics, linguistic anthropologyand cognitive linguistics, linguistic culturology and gender linguistics are considered the urgent directions of it. Cognitive linguistics investigates language as amechanism of transformation and codification of it. The aim of this linguistics covers the cognition of the world from one's point of view and ways of appearing of receiving processes, categorization, and classification of it.
According to a number of specialists, cognitive linguistics and linguaculturology are progressing in the frame of the collection of single general cognitive sciences [Kubryakova, 1994, 37-47]. The term of “Cognitive science” includes learning processes jointly, receiving them and reworking, saving and using, organizing thestructure of knowledge and collection, furthermore, it arranges collection of a certain scientific thought which is joint for forming the mental activity of these structures. Cognitive science is closely connected with mathematics, logic, philosophy, anthropology, and linguistics.

Linguaculturology is a complex scientific science direction appeared on the basis of inter reaction of linguistics and culturology. This direction investigates interconnection between culture and language and researches the language as a phenomenon of culture. It shows the observation of the world in the certain view by the cultural prism and by a certain nation’s mind and culture.

It is known that the first researches on gender started to be investigated in western humanitarian sciences. The reason of appearing them was the new views of investigations of the problems of intelligence, philosophy of science and philosophy of society.
Specifically, such anchor domains in modern linguistic research as communication, interaction, culture, habitus, cybernetics, culture, and cognition can be considered as a target of comparative typology.