INTRODUCTION
Positioning links special symbols or identities within a core strategy to build image. Positioning is how
specific products or services are located in the mental perceptions of customers in a certain target market.
Companies acquire competitive strategy through positioning (Smith & Keegan, 2003) to obtain competitive
advantage (Kim, 2002) and airlines are no exception. Airlines in Korea have been promoting various positioning
strategies to build a unified reputation and new image, thus recreating themselves for global competitiveness (Yoo,
1996). Most studies on positioning analyze three factors of mental image: cognitive, emotional, and active (Grunig,
1993). Existing positioning studies have certain difficulties unifying their approach because few studies of image
addressed are ambiguities (Grunig, 1993). It is important to define the thought and cognitive structure of customers
when image, a key factor on positioning studies, is researched (Han, 1999).
Within the cognitive psychology frame work, Bartlett (1932)’s work was the first to study and mention
schema, a process of cognitive structure in human beings in his book,
Remembering
. After Bartlett (1932)’s study,
Piaget (1952) suggested that schema has a perceptible structure. That is, schema theory is information codified to
memory, and thought is established as a group of models. Schema has been defined differently by several
researchers’ studies; however, the common definition of schema is the cognitive structure organizing information in
the memory process of human beings. Therefore, in order to study image, a cognitive factor of factors on positioning
studies, schema theory is necessary and essential as this schema theory is an alternative to overcoming ambiguities
and a rare definition of studies on image. In addition, schema theory has been developed in the cognitive psychology
area and was extended to other social sciences on the basis of schema (Anderson, 1980; Sherwood & Lee, 2003;
Stopa & Waters, 2005). Weber and Crocker (1983) studied schematic approach for change of customers’ belief and
cognition. Fiske and Pavelchak (1984) put emphasis on the schema theory, which has information about cognitive
belief and emotion. According to Nishida (1999)’s study, schema theory has different characteristics to compare
culture depending on types of schema. Schema theory can shed light on the influences of reorganizing memory,
input, re-cognition, and information in terms of some objects or information (Shen, 2004). Shimp (2000) insists that
these days customers are exposed to a great deal of information related to corporate images, and so corporations
should analyze how customers deal with, process, interpret, and incorporate such information.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |