Table 1.
Impact of 9/11 on Selected Travel Behaviors
.
Impact
Percentage of
respondents
during the first month
following 9/11 who . . .
Percentage of
respondents
since mid-October, 2001
who . . .
Considered canceling an airplane trip
27.0%
15.0%
Planned to stay close to home when you traveled
24.3%
13.6%
Considered canceling a trip to a major city
21.4%
10.3%
Canceled specific travel plans because of the danger or
terrorist attacks
17.0% 6.8%
Planned to avoid public places
15.1%
6.0%
Planned to avoid business travel
10.5%
6.9%
Mental Mapping Respondents’ Reaction to 9/11
The text base for this stage of the data analysis was generated from the answers of surveyed travelers to the
open-ended question. All texts were first "cleaned" to eliminate grammatical errors and then assembled into a single
text file. Content analysis methodology (Krippendorff, 2003) was adopted for its ability and usefulness in analysis
of large text databases in a particular context. Such a qualitative approach is an inductive process that emphasizes
the fit between data and an emerging phenomenon, rather than on progressing deductively from
a priori
hypotheses.
For the final data analysis, ATLAS.ti (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, 2006) was used to
examine the collected qualitative data in an organized fashion and identify recurrent themes and patterns. These
themes were then combined to form ‘codes’ that helped tag and connect different aspects of the data. Subsequently,
an explanatory network with the codes (logical nodes) and their relationships (conceptual links) was developed and
mapped. The authors then interpreted the results based on the networked structure.
Figure 2 illustrates the mental model mapping that resulted from this phase of the data analysis. This
network of codes and relationships suggests that the textual data fit the proposed model of hazard response. The top
branch of the map, for example, depicts the responses of travelers who reported that 9/11 had not impacted their
behavior. Comments such as “No change,” “No worry,” and “Normal life” typify these people. This pattern of
response seems to reflect a hazard response style that denies the existence of risk. In contrast the bottom two
branches of the network appear to reflect reactive response to the risk of terrorism. Respondents in these two
typologies included actions such as paying more “Attention to surroundings,” taking “Less travel,” doing “More
driving,” and being “Alert,” “Aware,” and “Cautious” when traveling. Overall this mental mapping exercise
appeared to support the hazard response model, suggesting that this sample of travelers could be typed into four
groups reflecting denial, acceptance, mitigation, and loss reduction in the face of terrorism.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |