Membrane Engineering: Progress and Potentialities in Gas Separations
285
particular, the feed channel spacer is typically about 20%
wider than the membrane
envelope. This additional width may promote fl ow perpendicular to the bulk fl ow (along
the spiral) [29] . Currently, the spiral wound modules contain around 1 – 2 m of rolled
sheets, for 20 – 40 m
2
of membrane area.
Each membrane module confi guration presents advantages and drawbacks. Hollow
fi bres are the cheapest on a per square metre basis (with the highest membrane area to
module volume ratio); however, to make very thin selective layers in hollow - fi bre form
is harder than in fl at sheet confi guration. This implies that the
permeance of hollow fi bres
is generally lower than that of a fl at sheet membrane prepared with the same material.
Therefore, larger membrane area is required for achieving the same separation by HF
modules. Hollow fi bre modules also require more pre - treatments of the feed than is
usually required by spiral wound modules for removing particles, oil residue and other
fouling components. These factors strongly affect the cost of the hollow fi bre module
design, therefore, currently, spiral wound modules are employed
in several separations
(e.g. in natural gas processing) particularly for those separations which cannot support
the costs associated with the hollow fi bre modules.
The size of the membrane modules for GS is rapidly increasing in order to follow the
economies of scale. As reported by Baker [30] , from 1980 up to now the size of Cynara ’ s
hollow - fi bres modules, employed for natural gas treatment, increased by a factor of 6,
while the spiral - wound modules are increasing, with the diameter passing from 20 cm to
30 cm (
Figure 14.2 ). GS systems require membrane modules
contained in high - pressure,
code - stamped vessels. The costs of the vessels, frames and associated pipes, valves, etc.
can be several times the cost of the membranes. Therefore, considerable reduction of costs
can be achieved by packing larger membrane modules into fewer vessels [29] . This
fact allows weight and footprint to be reduced. This is extremely important on offshore
platforms and other space - constrained facilities.
A membrane GS production process can be realized assembling the membrane modules
in several confi gurations, depending on the particular type of separation. The
single -
stage, double - stage, multi - stage with recycle constitute the main design solutions. Some
examples are given in the following paragraphs relative to the industrial applications for
the GS.
(a)
(b)
Housing
(shell)
Seal Bundle
in Housing
Potting
(seal)
Membrane
Perforated
permeate
collection
pipe
Residue
flow
Membrane
envelope
Permeate
spacer
Permeate
flow
Membrane
Feed
flow
Feed
spacer
Hollow
Fibers
Hollow Fiber Bundle
Figure 14.1 (a) Hollow fi bre module (image courtesy of www.medarray.com , Copyright
(2010) Medarray); (b) Spiral - wound module (image courtesy of www.mtrinc.com ,
Copyright (2010) mtrinc)