Магистерская диссертация

The purpose of the empirical study is to test the proposed theoretical model, namely, to establish the relationship between preferred strategies for responding to difficult life situations and personal characteristics of a person.
The object of the study is personal adaptations according to P. Ware and V. Joins.
The subject of the study is the relationship between personal adaptations according to P. Ware and V. Joines and ways to resolve difficult life situations.
The general theoretical hypothesis of the study : there is a connection between personal adaptations according to P. Ware and V. Joins and the preferred ways of resolving a difficult life situation (protection, coping, mastery, maladaptation).
Empirical research hypotheses :
1. Owners of personal adaptation Charming Manipulator more often choose mastery and disadaptation as a way to resolve a difficult life situation.
2. People with the Brilliant Skeptic personality adaptation prefer defensiveness and coping as strategies for dealing with difficult life situations.
3. Representatives of adaptations Creative Dreamer and Playful Rebel more often choose maladaptation and protection in a difficult life situation.
4. Over-Responsive Enthusiast and Responsible Workaholic adaptations prefer coping and mastery as a way of responding to difficult life situations.
Research methods. To determine the personal adaptations of the respondents, the "Questionnaire for personal adaptations of Joins (third version)" was used, translated by D.D. Kasyanova [Joins, Stewart, 2019, p. 443]. The preferred methods for resolving SAD are described on the basis of the results of the author's methodology "Questionnaire for handling SAD", created by us in collaboration with S.D. Timokhina.
Research objectives:
1. Develop a questionnaire in accordance with the theoretical model of ways to respond in difficult life situations, justify the possibility of highlighting all four designated ways.
2. Conduct an empirical test of the developed questionnaire.
3. To characterize the representatives of various personal adaptations in terms of the preferred ways of resolving TJS.