Learning to Write
Young students must learn a range of composing and
encoding processes, strategies, and orthographic
knowledge to be able to write, which can pose consid-
erable cognitive challenges (Scardamalia & Bereiter,
1986). Beginning writers must make decisions about
what to write and hold that text in short- term mem-
ory while using their knowledge of letter sounds and
letter formation to get that message into print. They
need to learn the conventions of written language, as
well as a repertoire of cognitive strategies to be used
flexibly during the composing process—all the while
maintaining interest in and motivation for the writ-
ing task. Learning to write also involves recognizing
and participating in valued ways of “doing writing”
in particular classrooms. Young students’ success at
coordinating these complexities can have a profound
impact on learning to write, as well as their sense
of agency and identity as writers (Ball & Ellis, 2008).
The good news is that teachers can support the
learning- to- write process through explicit instruc-
tion, modeling, and guided practice (Harris, Graham,
Friedlander, & Laud, 2013)—key components of inter-
active writing.
Interactive Writing
Interactive writing is grounded in cognitive and so-
ciocultural theories of learning (Clay, 2001; Lave &
Wenger, 1991; Vygotsky, 1978; Wertsch, 1998). The
cognitive processes are situated and developed
within a writing activity that is socioculturally
constructed by teacher and students. The purpose
of interactive writing is to mediate students’ un-
derstanding of what it means to write. Lessons are
how- to oriented; teachers model what students are
expected to do during independent writing. The les-
son begins with the teacher and students collabora-
tively planning the text they will write, often revising
the oral message several times. Then, the teacher
and students “share the pen” (McCarrier et al., 2000,
p. xvii) to write the oral message on a large writing
tablet, word by word. When the teacher writes, she
thinks aloud to give students a window into her com-
posing process (e.g., “Should we use
ridiculous
instead
FEATURE ARTICLE
The Reading Teacher Vol. 71 No. 5 pp. 523–532
doi:10.1002/trtr.1643 © 2017 International Literacy Association
Cheri Williams
is a professor of literacy and second-
language studies in the School of Education at the
University of Cincinnati, OH, USA; e-mail cheri.williams@
uc.edu.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |