Table 18
Correlation matrix of dependencies between indicators of physical development and physical fitness of female students of the first year of medical school
№
|
Tests (indicators)
|
х 6
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
1
|
Body length, cm
|
|
х
|
69
|
06
|
11
|
13
|
44
|
46
|
09
|
2
|
Body weight, kg
|
|
|
х
|
13
|
-16
|
09
|
64
|
19
|
-13
|
3
|
Running 100 m, s
|
|
|
|
х
|
47
|
-71
|
-13
|
-36
|
-44
|
4
|
Running 500 m, s
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
-19
|
-21
|
-16
|
-20
|
5
|
Long jump, cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
26
|
38
|
41
|
6
|
Grenade throwing, m
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
04
|
41
|
7
|
Forward tilt, cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
13
|
8
|
Dynamometry, kg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
A high degree of correlation was found between tests related to the development of high-speed qualities and speed-strength capabilities of girls, who were evaluated based on the results in the 100 m run and the long jump with a run (r=- 0.61). The presence of such a positive correlation is well known, because achievements in the long jump with a run-up largely depend on the sprinting capabilities of those involved. A similar correlation was found between the results in the 100 m run and the performance in the 500 m run.
Table 19
Correlation matrix of dependencies between indicators of physical development and physical fitness of female students of the second year of medical secondary school
№
|
Tests (indicators)
|
х 6
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
1
|
Body length, cm
|
|
х
|
82
|
09
|
12
|
10
|
46
|
43
|
2
|
Body weight, kg
|
|
|
х
|
16
|
-08
|
60
|
21
|
-13
|
3
|
Running 100 m, s
|
|
|
|
х
|
36
|
-71
|
-16
|
-29
|
4
|
Running 500 m, s
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
-19
|
-16
|
-15
|
5
|
Grenade throwing, m
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
04
|
41
|
6
|
Forward tilt, cm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
13
|
7
|
Dynamometry, kg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
х
|
It is interesting to note that there is a less significant correlation between body weight and achievements in grenade throwing. This is due to the fact that throwing grenades is technically quite a difficult movement, and poor possession of throwing skills, which does not allow girls to realize their potential advantages arising from the fact of large total body sizes. The above motor qualities have little correlation with the indicators of flexibility
The correlation analysis revealed that all correlation coefficients are relatively easy to explain and are in good agreement with the data found in the specialized literature during similar studies. This gives reason to conclude that our results are fairly typical and do not contain any gross errors or artifacts. The existence of quite significant correlations between some indicators of total body size and the results in individual physical exercises gives reason to question the question and the expediency of using these test tasks in the same form for all subjects without exception. Probably, an amendment is needed here in the form of introducing weight categories or using regression equations.
LITERATURE
1. The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On the national training program", Tashkent. 1997. – 25 p.
2. The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On physical culture and sports". Tashkent 2002. – 25 p.
3. The Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan URK – 3994 of September 4, Tashkent, 2015 "On physical culture and sports",
4. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan UP-4947 dated February 7, 2017 "Action Strategy for five priority areas of development of the Republic of Uzbekistan in 2017-2021",
5. Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan UP-5368 dated March 5, 2018 “On measures to radically improve the system of public administration in the field of physical culture and sports”
6. Abdullaev A, Honkeldiev Sh. Zhismony tarbia nazariasi va uslubiati. - T.: Uzdzhti, 2007. - B. 231.
7. Ashmarin B.A. Theory and methodology of physical education M. 1990 359 p.
8. Vinogradov P.A. Physical culture and healthy lifestyle: Textbook — M., 1999 - 287 p
. 9. Goloshchapov B.R. History of physical culture and sports — M., 2001.
10. Goncharova O.V. Development of physical abilities in young athletes Tashkent 2005 - 174 p.
11. Dubrovsky V.I. Sports medicine — M., 1998.
12. Zatsiorsky V.M. Physical qualities of an athlete M. 2001
13. Ilyinich V.I. Student's physical culture — M., 2001.
14. Kotz Ya.M. Physiology of muscular activity — M., 1992.
15. Laptev A.P. Hygiene of mass sports — M., 1994.
16. Maslyakov V.A. Mass physical culture at the university — M., 1991 - 235 p.
17. Matveev L.P. Introduction to the theory of physical culture — M., 1986
18. Matveev L.P. Theory and methodology of physical culture — M., 1991 – 541 p.
19. Popov S.N. Sports medicine, therapeutic physical culture and massage — M., 1995.
20. Smirnov V.M. Physiology of physical education and sports. — M., 2002.
21. Timushkin, A.V. Health and physical culture of a student — Balashov, 2002.
22. Filin V.P. Education of physical qualities in young athletes — M., 2001- 231 p.
23. Halmukhamedov R.D., Goncharova O.V. Testing the physical fitness of applicants. Tashkent – 2010 -152 p .
24. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh. Physical fitness of students. - Tashkent: Medicine, 1996. - p. 205.
25. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh., Abdullaev A.A. " Soglom turmush tarzining zhismony madaniyati " Ukuv kullanma. “ Fargona " 2011. 177 b.
25. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh. Physical status of students - Tashkent, 2018. - 432 p.
27. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh., Kim V.G. Physical culture and student health \ Educational method. stipend. Fergana 2014
28. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh. Metrology of physical education \ Educational method. stipend. Ferghana 2015- 83 p.
29. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh., Uraimov S.R. The physical status of pre–conscription youth - Monograph, Fergana, 2020 - 115 p.
30. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh. Factor structure of motor skills of students – Russia Nizhnevartovsk 2021. - 122 p.
31. Khankeldiev Sh.Kh. Uraimov S.R. Theoretical foundations of physical status - ,Monograph , Fergana , 2021 - 115 p.
32. Yunusova Yu.M. Theory and methodology of physical culture Tashkent 2007 311 p
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |