883
Charalampos Machairas
Thessaloniki, Greece;
maxairas.xaralampos@gmail.com
Christ, Melchizedec, David and the Controversy about the Azymes:
A Reinterpretation of a Sinaitic Icon
Among the many icons of the Sacred Monastery of the God-Trodden Mount of Sinai is
included an icon with three holy figures dated to the beginning of the 12
th
century.
Based on the
icon’s inscriptions modern researchers recognized Christ portrayed in bust and also the full-standing
figures of Abraham and Melchizedec. However it is possible that the inscriptions were repainted
during a restoration made in the 18
th
century. There is also the possibility that the inscriptions
copied the previous ones. It is also true that the narrative scene of the meeting of Abraham and
Melchizedec, an event which is described in the book of the Genesis of the Old Testament, can be
found in illustrated manuscripts. For example the scene is depicted in a miniature found on fol.
68r of the codex Vat. gr. 746. However the purpose of this paper is to prove that the two depicted
full-length holy figures are in fact that of priest-king Melchizedec and prophet David. This is
another scene of Byzantine art that is found mainly in decorated manuscripts.
An almost identical
composition to the Sinaitic icon, with Melchizedec and David turning toward the roundel of Christ,
is represented on a miniature now kept in Saint Petersburg that originally belonged to the codex 61
of the Pantokrator Monastery on Mount Athos, which is dated to the end of the 9
th
century. Similar
compositions can be found on fol. 25r of the manuscript Par. gr. 20, now kept in the Bibliothéque
Nationale, dated to the 9
th
century, and on fol. 152r of the manuscript Add. 19.352 in the British
Library, commonly known as the Theodore Psalter and dated to 1066. Another example is a
miniature on fol. 194r of the codex Barb. gr. 372 (Barberini Psalter)
of the Vatican Library, which is
dated to the second half of the 11
th
century. The scene is connected with the Holy Communion, as in
the last three manuscripts the Communion of the Apostles is represented between Melchizedec and
David. Then the Sinaitic icon reproduces a composition which is connected with Holy Communion
and is also linked with a theological controversy between the Orthodox
and the Latin Church that
had begun from the 11
th
century and continued during the 12
th
and 13
th
centuries. The Orthodox
Church supported the practice of using leavened bread for the Holy Communion, while the Latin
Church used unleavened bread (azymes). Many theological works were written at this period. For
example at the end of the 11
th
century Nicholas of Andida wrote treatises on azymes. Furthermore
the Patriarch of Constantinople Nicholas III or IV addressed a letter to the Patriarch of Jerusalem
in which he refuted the use of azymes by the Latins. It seems possible then that there was also a
dispute between Orthodox and Latins in the Holy Land. This is not a mere speculation.
The Russian
pilgrim abbot Daniel, who visited the Holy Land in the 12
th
century, records a church at Mount
Tabor dedicated to Melchizedec. Daniel also stresses that at this place Melchizedec performed a
sacrifice with leavened bread and wine, in fact a prefiguration of Christ’s celebration of the Holy
Communion, and he did not offer azymes. We must also note that in the
scenes of the manuscripts
and the icon Melchizedec holds an ewer with wine and a paten with bread, because the text of the
884
Genesis mentions that he made an offering with bread and wine. It is then likely that the donor of
the icon, who is a bishop depicted in prostration before David, wanted to make clear that he was
following the doctrine of the Orthodox Church.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: