Chapter 8 examines communities’ crucial role in achieving
inclusive education and
protecting students from
discriminatory attitudes, which affect school climate as
well as students’ safety, well-being and learning. Parents of
vulnerable children, like other parents, may support more
inclusive education but also be apprehensive about its
implementation. Grassroots and civil society organizations
have promoted inclusion through
education service
provision, advocacy and scrutiny of government actions.
Chapter 9 looks at all the main inclusion challenges through
the lens of COVID-19. The pandemic has forced education
ministries to respond under extremely challenging
circumstances, which has led to considerable reliance
on distance learning solutions. This chapter considers
whether such solutions have respected the principle of
‘doing no harm’ to marginalized populations that may have
been left out. Governments need to ensure not only the
continuation
of education, helping those disadvantaged
catch up, but also support students’ well-being.
Finally, Chapter 10 offers a conclusion and
recommendations.
A note on methodology
This regional report draws on analysis of primary data
collected in 30 education systems of Central and Eastern
Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia: those of Albania,
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia,
Hungary,
Kazakhstan, Kosovo,
1
Kyrgyzstan, Latvia,
Lithuania, Mongolia, Montenegro, North Macedonia,
Poland, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, the
Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Tajikistan,
Turkey, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. Although Turkmenistan
is also in the region, it was
not possible to include a
description of its education system.
Drawing on the approach of the 2020
Global Education
Monitoring Report
on inclusion and education and the
expertise of two partner organizations, the European
Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education (EASNIE)
and the Network of Education Policy Centers (NEPC), a
template for data collection was developed to explore
national policies and practices on inclusion and education in
the seven areas covered by the report. Piloted in Mongolia,
Poland and Turkey, the template
was then completed by
national experts and government representatives from
December 2019 to March 2020. Representative examples
by geography, demography and policy approaches were
identified and explored in more depth. EASNIE country or
affiliated local representatives and NEPC-affiliated local
organizations or individual experts reviewed and validated
the information.
A summary of evidence from the 30 education systems
is available in an annex. Full descriptions
of all education
systems are available on the regional report website
and are the key reference for most examples used. They
expand considerably, and add to, the country profiles that
originally informed the 2020
Global Education Monitoring
Report
, which are available at the Profiles Enhancing
Education Reviews (PEER) website.
With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic during
the development of this regional report,
data coverage
was extended to include information on education
system responses. A survey by NEPC in selected
countries was complemented by desk-based research to
inform Chapter 9.
1
References to Kosovo shall be understood to be in the context of Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999)
.
27
C E N T R A L A N D E A S T E R N E U R O P E , C A U C A S U S A N D C E N T R A L A S I A