23
•
Bottom-up approach vs. global level recommendations. While the findings for this
synthesis report are drawn from the country level, many of the recommendations
aim at the global level. Despite efforts made by the team to understand processes
and activities at the global level, the scope of the evaluation did not allow for
a detailed assessment of all ongoing political processes, including concerning
other pillars of humanitarian reform (such as financing and the humanitarian
coordinator system) or other reform processes (such as integrated missions).
Therefore, the evaluation team faced limitations developing the detailed steps
required to implement some of the recommendations.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: