Army or withdraw hastily into Arabia, neither of which alternatives was pleasant to
contemplate. The Caliph rejected the second one outright. There was no question of
returning to Arabia in face of the Roman threat. The invasion of Syria had been launched;
it must be sustained. But what caused Abu Bakr the greatest anxiety was the question of
who should command the Muslim army? Abu Bakr had ordered that Abu Ubaidah would
take command of the army whenever the corps were united for battle. Abu Ubaidah was a
wise, intelligent man, and a widely esteemed and venerated Muslim. He was also a man
of unquestionable personal courage. But knowing his mild and gentle nature and his lack
of experience in the command of military forces in major operations, Abu Bakr had
serious misgivings about his ability to lead the entire Muslim army in a serious clash with
the powerful and sophisticated army of Eastern Rome.
Abu Bakr reached the best conclusion which was possible under the circumstances: he
would send Khalid bin Al Waleed to command the Muslim army in Syria! Khalid had
recently shattered the Persian army in several bloody battles. Khalid would know what to
do. This decision made Abu Bakr feel lighter, as if a heavy burden had been lifted off his
shoulders.
"By Allah,"
he said,
"I shall destroy the Romans and the friends of Satan with
Khalid bin Al Waleed!"
1
He consequently despatched a fast rider to Hira with
instructions for Khalid to move with half his army to Syria, take command of the Muslim
forces and fight the Romans.
The next chapter takes up the thread of events which constituted Khalid's conquest of
Syria. This subject is taken up with the full realization of the possibility of error in the
account of this campaign, because of the confusion and the contradictions that exist in the
narratives of the early historians. There is disagreement about many important aspects of
this military history-in the dates of the great battles; in the strengths of the forces
deployed in these battles, in the order in which these battles were fought; even, in the
case of the odd battle, about who commanded the army at the time. The only writer who
has described the campaign in meticulous detail is Waqidi; but his account also contains
errors, as it is based on narratives passed down orally from the Syrian veterans, which
sometimes conflict.
In this book has been prepared, from all the accounts available, a sequence of events and
a version of these events which makes the most military sense and leaves the least room
for contradiction. The reader has been spared copious footnotes, explaining each
alternative version and each deviation from the commonly accepted version of this
campaign; but he will find footnotes in the case of the more important issues, so that he
may form his own opinion. And Allah knows best!
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: