ACTIVE AND PASSIVE VOICE IN ACADEMIC DISCOURSE
145
Passive voice is common in academic discourse since it is often felt necessary to
shift the focus from human agency to the actions, processes and events being
described. In academic writing in particular, foregrounding the writer/researcher
in such processes is often felt to be inappropriate (
Û
also 148
):
A total of 14 case studies
were recorded. The data were analysed using
principles of conversation analysis and thematic analysis set within a
hermeneutic interpretative framework. In order to illuminate presentations of
autonomy in practice, focus-group discussions with nurses and older people
were used as part of the interpretative process. I discuss the factors that
prevented the operationalisation of an individualised rights-based concept of
autonomy for older people.
Note how the research process is described in the passive voice (were recorded,
were analysed
, were used), while the author changes to active voice (I discuss)
when signposting the section dealing with personal stance and evaluation of the
research.
Passive voice (along with the present tense,
Û
144b
) is particularly prevalent in
abstracts to academic papers and articles:
The urban hierarchy of an English region in the period 1300–1540
is defined,
using both documentary and archaeological evidence. The part of the East
Midlands studied – Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland – contained
twenty towns. ‘Benchmarks’ for placing towns in the hierarchy
are explored,
including population, topography, social structure, occupational diversity,
marketing and migratory networks, administration, and civic and material
culture. The conclusion
emphasizes the common urban characteristics of all of
the towns studied, the compatibility of written and unwritten evidence, and the
stability of the urban system.
Note here that active voice (emphasizes) occurs with the impersonal subject the
conclusion
(compare the alternative constructions which would foreground the
researcher: I conclude/I emphasize in the conclusion).
However, personal subjects and active voice verbs do occur frequently in
academic discourse, particularly where a researcher is laying claim to a different
or new approach to something, or contrasting their approach with that of others:
The acquisition of the English past tense inflection is the paradigm example of
rule learning in the child language literature and has become something of a
test case for theories of language development. This is unfortunate, as the
idiosyncratic properties of the English system of marking tense make it a rather
unrepresentative example of morphological development. In this paper,
I
contrast this familiar inflection with a much more complex morphological
subsystem, the Polish genitive.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |