Conclusion
In
the area of road traffic, electric vehicles cannot be the only strategy for
achieving the climate and environmental protection goals. A sustainable mobility
turnaround will only be successful if the focus is also on avoiding car travel
and shifting to other modes of transport. This also corresponds
to the vision of
a liveable city with an attractive public transport network, more pedestrians,
more cyclists and short distances between work, home and shops and services.
Nevertheless, it is likely that motorized vehicles will
continue to be used for a
significant proportion of journeys in the future.
It is therefore important to lessen the impact of car traffic on the climate and the
environment. Electric cars can make an increasingly significant contribution to
reaching this goal. This applies above all to climate protection – an area in which
electric cars already have a clear lead. This lead will continue
to grow as the share
of renewable energies in electricity generation continues to increase. It is highly
likely that today’s newly registered vehicles will still be on the roads in 2030 and
that at least 65 percent of electricity will then come from renewable sources.
22
How eco-friendly are electric cars?
The picture is more differentiated for the other environmental impacts. More
raw materials are used for electric cars than for conventional vehicles and
more particulate matter is emitted over the entire life cycle as well. In terms
of
nitrogen oxide emissions, diesel vehicles in particular are now in a better
position, because vehicles registered from 2020 onwards generally adhere to the
legal limit values even during real life driving. Nevertheless, the actual health
impact also depends on where the emissions are generated. So it matters “what
comes out directly at the exhaust”. In
this respect, electric vehicles continue to
have an advantage in polluted urban environments because they are locally
emission-free.
All in all, then, the overall assessment depends on how the various factors are
weighted
and balanced, and on the timescales used. Should climate protection
be weighted more heavily than the use of raw materials? How should the local
protection of human health be valued, as opposed to
emissions outside of city
centres? And what climate-friendly alternatives actually exist – if we want the car
to be part of our future?