-

Competition Challenges Amfac Supremacy

The first break in this tight control appeared soon thereafter. Within a few short years in the very early ‘50’s the grocery departments of both American Factors and Davies – largest of their wholesale departments – had dwindled to minor brokerage businesses. It was primarily the result of the introduction of supermarket chain methods to Hawaii – direct volume buying – with consequently lower food prices. To compete with Foodland and other supermarket chains, grocers could not afford to buy from big wholesalers: Amfac, Davies and Alexander & Baldwin. They organized instead purchasing cooperatives, Certified and IGA.

By the mid-1950’s strong undercurrents of change were evident. Mainland retailers – Long’s, Woolworth, Hartfield and Leeds – were coming in and in certain cases, introducing a type of price competition entirely novel to the islands.

While experiencing competition in many lines in both retailing and wholesaling, Amfac began to trip over itself in its expansion efforts into residential land development and appliance distribution. The symbiotic relationship of selling lumber and acting as insurance agent was seized upon to tie up builders with a unique “one stop service.” The company would provide them with performance bonds as well as building supplies, extend credit terms amounting to interim financing, and then take over the eventual home mortgages for placement and servicing with the insurance companies it represented. Nor did the inter-relationships stop there since the house tracts provided an expanding market for Amfac the appliance distributor. In this field as GE’s Hawaii representative the company was in competition with its retail store clientele.

Meantime the company had embarked on large-scale land development on Oahu and Maui. The Oahu development was a residential undertaking in association with tract builder Joe Pao and the Bishop Estate, from whom Amfac leased the land involved at Halawa. It resulted in an eventual 3,000 single family houses, although Amfac’s returns were modest. The Maui project was a giant one even for Amfac: the Kaanapali resort development. It absorbed a great deal of capital and was slow to generate any real return to the corporation as the property owner bearing the greatest risk.

Amfac Looks Beyond Hawaii’s Shores to New Horizons

Next Amfac, having organized a land development subsidiary, embarked on a California real estate venture in the Napa Valley known as Silverado. While it too was slow to generate a return, it was the company’s first experience in offering food and lodging as an operator rather than as a landlord.

In the early ‘60’s Amfac followed Brewer’s lead into exporting farming know-how to the world at large. Two large projects resulted from the enterprise, one in Uruguay and the other in Western Australia. The South American sugar venture was an operating success and a financial failure. While field and factory goals were exceeded, run-away inflation within the country doomed the operation. The Australian project was a huge undertaking in diversified agricultural development in the Esperance district. Again returns were slow in materializing, although they began to be posted in the ‘70’s, a decade later. The overseas consulting subsidiary was sold to employees.

Board Room Dissension Tests Management’s Metal

Despite these post-war efforts at diversification and expansion beyond Hawaii’s shores, there was dissension in Amfac’s board room. It began with Howard Butcher, the Philadelphia stockbroker who had bought heavily into both Brewer and Amfac stock. As a director, he urged management to merge their plantations into the corporation for the benefit to Amfac’s stock, rely more on debt in order to practice leverage financing, and go out for Big Board stock listing. He even proposed a Brewer-Amfac merger to cut overhead.

Unsuccessful in his persuasion, he sold out but was followed by other aggressive mainland investors anxious for quick action: Los Angeles insurance man J. C. Earle, transit line-real estate speculator Harry Weinberg, and Southern California electronics maker Leslie Hoffman. Even an island missionary descendent, Harold Rice, voiced the need for more imaginative management.

Nevertheless, change was taking hold, first in coping with internal growing pains and subsequently in recognition of the financial opportunities Butcher foresaw. Wholesale operations were completely revamped in the mid-‘60’s under H. Alexander Walker’s son, H. A. Jr. As a youth he had gained some experience in the merchandise side of the business but had risen, through staff assignments, within the plantation division. Assigned to straighten out control problems in wholesale distribution (2,500 TV sets valued at $500,000 had disappeared from company warehouses), he undertook radical surgery. He spun off retail appliances and building materials as well as liquor, tobacco, coffee, and drygood lines. The renovated mercantile operation relies heavily on drop shipments. It no longer ties up heavy amounts of capital in inventory characteristic of the days when the “Diversity, Inc.” brochure was issued. (Eventually building materials returned to the corporate fold, however, when the buyer went broke.) Mortgage servicing was set up as a separate subsidiary, which branched into equipment leasing and appliance paper. The Liberty House retail stores expanded. Yet, management in both these fields felt constrained by head office financial policies.

Corporate Recasting Achieved

A corporate transformation was gaining traction, nonetheless. The plantations became subsidiaries. The insurance business was sold. The company did obtain listing on the New York Stock Exchange (adopting its cable name “Amfac” as its legal corporate name), and mainland financial and real estate talent was recruited.

In 1967 Walker assumed the presidency and set about organizing a new executive team. Gilbert Cox, the company’s attorney, and financial officer E. Laurence Gay, a one-time Wall Street lawyer and Litton Industries executive, set a new course for the company. Spurred by a rising stock market, the trio forged a shrewdly leveraged conglomerate in a few short years. Retail management was given its head and expanded to the western states, acquiring the Joseph Magnin and Rhodes retail department store chains. The leasing subsidiary absorbed several Pacific Coast mortgage companies and branched into uninsured, high-interest thrift-savings and loan shops both in Hawaii and Guam. Within a few years this departure had made Amfac Hawaii’s largest industrial loan company.

The recast merchandising operation began acquiring a network of small family distributorships in electrical and pharmaceutical lines throughout the mainland from Alaska to Kansas and Louisiana. The historic Fred Harvey organization of restaurants, national park lodges and food service concessions was acquired in 1968. In the following year Amfac grew closer to home by buying out Gus Guslander’s Island Holidays hotel chain, whose own leveraged growth was legendary.

In the early ‘70’s, still hungry for acquisitions, the company acquired a number of western food processors: a frozen potato, fruit and vegetable outfit operating throughout the northwest, an Alaskan seafood processor and a Colorado cattle feeding and beef processor. The later proved a sour investment and was written off, however.