Chapter 9
Assessing Your Progress
If you think there is or might be a timing problem, next look at the second and third reports (by Ques
tion Format and Difficulty). These two reports (one each for Quant and Verbal) tell you your perfor
mance based upon the difficulty levels of the questions.
In these two reports, there are two important trends to note:
1. Average timing that is 30 seconds (or more) higher or lower than the expected
average, and whether that is happening on correct or incorrect questions (or both)
2. Lower percentages correct on lower-level questions than on higher-level questions
In particular, these two things might appear together. If that happens, you might be spending too much
time on incorrect higher-level questions and not enough time on lower-level questions, which you are
then getting wrong as a result.
The timing averages for Reading Comprehension can be misleading because the first question for each
passage includes the time to read the passage itself. For RC, you need to dive back into the problem list
to look at each problem individually in order to get a true picture of what happened.
Finally, look at the fourth and fifth reports (Quant by Content Area and
Topic, Verbal by Verbal Type and Topic). Before you do this, though, you
may decide to run the reports based on your last two or three tests rather
than just your last test. You’re diving deep into the details with these final
two reports, so there will be lots of categories with only one or two ques
tions unless you add more data to the report.
The fourth and fifth reports show all of the questions broken out by ques
tion type and subtype or subtopic. In general, you should split each content
sub-topic into one of five categories:
Group 1. You got these right roughly within the expected time frame (>50% right and neither way too
slow nor way too fast).
These are your strengths. Going forward, they’re not high on your priority list, but there may
still be things you can learn, such as: faster ways to do the problem; ways to make educated
guesses (so that you can use the thought process on harder problems of the same type); and
how to quickly recognize future problems of the same type. Also, make sure that you actually
knew what you were doing for each problem and didn’t just get lucky! Finally, you may want to
move on to more advanced material in these areas.
Group 2. You got these wrong roughly within the expected timef rame (<50% right and neither way
too slow nor way too fast).
These indicate a possible weakness in content or methodology, but check the difficulty levels—
perhaps you just happened to get a couple of really hard ones in the same category.
TIP
If you choose to look at the data from only one
test for these last two categories, be aware
that your analysis may need to be
flexible for
those sub-categories with only 1 question. If
you get 0% of 1 question right, that doesn't
mean that area is a big weakness!
„ ..................................... ...........................................^
area
192
M A N H A T T A N
GM AT