Further reading: J. F. Ade Ajayi, Michael Crowder,
ed., History of West Africa. 2 vols. (London: Longman,
1987); Louis Brenner, Muslim Identity and Social Change
in Sub-Saharan Africa (Bloomington: Indiana University
Press, 1993); Peter B. Clark, West Africa and Islam (Lon-
don: Arnold, 1982); Mervyn Hiskett, The Development
of Islam in West Africa (London: Longman, 1984).
West Bank
See p
alestine
.
Westernization
The process of Westernization is generally,
although not exclusively, associated with changes
as postcolonial and developing nations move from
more traditional political, social, and economic
systems of organization to models mirroring
Western, primarily western European and North
American, societies and the institutions that devel-
oped there in the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries.
These changes include industrialization, the move
toward capitalism, the development of parliamen-
tarianism, the growth of state bureaucracies, and a
new, increasingly private role for religion.
Beginning in the late 19th century, Muslim
societies experienced heightened interaction with
Western powers and ideas, most notably through
the latter’s colonial activities in the Middle East
and North Africa, as well as in South and South-
east Asia. Among other effects of this contact
was the initiation of reform efforts in Muslim
societies, most notably the Ottoman Empire.
Intellectually and politically, Ottoman officials,
regional governors, and intellectuals worked to
reconcile modern Western ideas of
edUcation
,
economics, law, the family, and
science
with an
Islamic framework. Many of the same issues with
which these figures grappled in the 19th century
continue to inform debate today.
Many disputes surrounding the idea and phe-
nomenon of Westernization focus on the origins
of its constitutive elements and the degree to
which they are transferable to non-Western soci-
eties. Some of the most widely felt and passionate
debates about the meaning of Westernization and
its effects have taken place in societies with major-
ity Muslim populations. In many cases, these
debates center on whether or not modernization
can be distinguished from Westernization, that
is, whether it is possible to integrate modern sci-
entific, religious, political, social, and economic
ideas while at the same time protecting aspects of
local identities and institutions.
In both i
ran
and e
gypt
, for example, serious
attempts have been made to distinguish tech-
nological, military, economic, religious, social,
and political changes from outright adherence
to Western ideas and norms. The association of
many of these ideas and institutions with
colo
-
nialism
and imperialism has inspired strenuous
efforts to distinguish modernization from West-
ernization, with the latter most often tied to the
onset of social and moral decay. Modernization,
on the other hand, refers to the use of modern
science and technologies and is generally accepted
by Islamists and other critics of Westernization.
In fact, many urban Islamists have a background
in the modern natural sciences, reflecting a per-
ceived distinction between the cultural effects of
Westernization, generally seen as destructive, and
K 710
West Bank
the technological and economic benefits of mod-
ernization. Governments, too, have been forced to
make this distinction in order to garner legitimacy
in the eyes of their citizens.
See also m
UstaFa
k
emal
a
tatürk
; r
Uhollah
k
homeini
; m
Uhammad
m
Uhammad
a
li
dynasty
;
secUlarism
.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |