TRANSITION MANAGEMENT
275
depend on the nature of the change. Consider, for example, the amalgamation
of
two schools, with representatives of each school and of the LEA managing
it:
(1) Plans need to be developed to manage
(a)
the period of the change;
(b)
any unaffected systems (e.g. a youth wing on one site);
(c)
organizational integration and operational effectiveness during the
change (i.e. managing the ‘present state’); and
(d)
the future situation, when amalgamation is complete.
(2) Because change can be unsettling to people, their apprehension has to be
recognized and assuaged as far as possible. Rumours may spread, so
clear information about the future state and its effect on people inside
and outside the school must be supplied.
(3) Planning needs to cover changes in structures, roles, tasks, people and
formal and informal systems. Many attempts at change go wrong when
these elements are treated in isolation, so make sure that there is
consistency and integration.
(4) The person leading the change needs to be visible,
and available to give
guidance and support, especially in connection with any conflicts that
arise. Any negative energy (frustration, anxiety, threat) needs to be
managed so as to encourage constructive behaviour.
(5) People need help in understanding the nature of change. There will
always be uncertainty, since at the outset only broad outlines can be set,
and the details usually require the involvement of many people.
(6) Communications and information systems need to be effective and to
operate in both directions, since: (a) role expectations will need
clarifying; (b) norms and assumptions need to be brought into the open
and examined; and (c) implications for workloads and job satisfaction
need to be understood. Especially important are sensitive areas such as
job security and rewards.
(7) Empathy with those affected by the change is important: the ‘death’ of
one of the schools in an amalgamation may induce a sensation akin to
mourning, and people need time to disengage from the present state and
adjust to the future. In these circumstances
some counselling may be
needed.
These needs can place a high demand on management and lead to emotional
strain if they are not planned for in advance. Admittedly, the amalgamation
of two schools is a somewhat extreme example of change, but it is surprising
how people can be disturbed and upset by even relatively modest changes, if
they feel threatened or disadvantaged in any way. As Fullan says (1982, p.
120), you have to understand the subjective world of the role incumbents as a
necessary precondition for engaging in any change effort with them: you must
understand what reality is to those in each role. To do this, personal contact is
essential, with time for discussion and reassurance.
276
EFFECTIVE SCHOOL MANAGEMENT
It is therefore of critical importance that organizational arrangements to
provide the time and skill required are carefully thought out and designed.
These arrangements then need to be communicated so that everyone
concerned understands how the change is being managed.
DEVELOPING A PLAN
Using a ‘crisis management’ approach to cope with change is not to be
recommended, as it is extremely stressful for all concerned. It is far better to
draw up a strategic plan to deal with the process of change. Burnes (2000)
states that successful organizations spend 90 per cent of the time planning
and organizing change and 10 per cent implementing it.
Effective planning
does not come naturally to many teachers, although anyone who has
constructed a school timetable will obviously have valuable expertise. In the
authors’ experience teachers tend to confuse decisions or intentions with plans,
so that specificity is lacking.
A process plan is like a road map for the change effort. It contains detailed
statements on who is to do what by when; it clarifies objectives and sets
mileposts along the path to their achievement. It unambiguously specifies
the means of its own implementation, and it incorporates ways of checking
and monitoring progress. The characteristics of an effective plan can be
summarized as follows. It is
(1)
purposeful: the activities are clearly linked to the change goals and
priorities;
(2)
task specific: the types of activities involved are clearly identified rather
than broadly generalized, and responsibility for carrying them out is
unambiguously
assigned;
(3)
temporal: target dates are specified and achievement is monitored;
(4)
integrated: the discrete activities are linked to show interdependencies
and sequencing networks;
(5)
adaptable: there are contingency plans and ways of adapting to
unexpected problems, such as time slippage and unforeseen resistance;
and
(6)
cost-effective: in terms of the investment of both time and people.
There is one further point. The people who are assigned responsibility for
implementing the various activities in the plan usually have their normal work
to perform as well: the change activities are an added extra. Management
may see the additional responsibilities as an enrichment of their normal work.
However, if the change activities do not bring with them a pressure to achieve
targets equal to that which applies to operational work, then they will not be
regarded as fundamental to the job. So if change activities are inadequately
recognized or rewarded, those involved will give a higher priority, in the
direction
of their energy, to the area which provides the intrinsic rewards, e.g.
classroom teaching. Therefore management should be explicit in regarding
TRANSITION MANAGEMENT
277
work on change as part of the primary work of the people concerned, and
attempt to recognize, reward or punish it accordingly. In some circumstances
this may involve negotiation and the temporary transfer, curtailment or
postponement of operational work.
PERSONAL APPLICATION
Reflect carefully on the adequacy of any plans for major change or other projects
with which you have been associated. What went wrong? Which of the characteristics
of an effective plan were wanting? Can you generalize about the shortcomings that
most often recur? What can you resolve to do about it?
HIERARCHY OF OBJECTIVES
There are two main approaches to the development of tension and energy in
organizations. The first is the use of controls and the second is the use of
purpose, goals and objectives. Controls are effective only if they are backed
by a rigorously used
reward and punishment system, which can lead to the
development of negative energy if mishandled. Purpose, goals and objectives
generate tension by developing hope for achievement and of a better condition
in the future. However, once a goal is achieved, tension is relaxed and there is
no further generation of energy. In order to maintain tension continuously, it
is necessary to establish a hierarchy of objectives and to update them regularly.
It is possible to identify four levels of objectives:
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: