CHAPTER IX.
The necessary preparations for scenery and dresses, and whatever else was
requisite, were now proceeding. In regard to certain scenes and passages, our
friend had whims of his own, which Serlo humored, partly in consideration of
their bargain, partly from conviction, and because he hoped by these civilities to
gain Wilhelm, and to lead him according to his own purposes the more implicitly
in time to come.
Thus, for example, the King and Queen were, at the first audience, to appear
sitting on the throne, with the courtiers at the sides, and Hamlet standing
undistinguished in the crowd. “Hamlet,” said he, “must keep himself quiet: his
sable dress will sufficiently point him out. He should rather shun remark than
seek it. Not till the audience is ended, and the King speaks with him as with a
son, should he advance, and allow the scene to take its course.”
A formidable obstacle still remained, in regard to the two pictures which
Hamlet so passionately refers to in the scene with his mother. “We ought,” said
Wilhelm, “to have both of them visible, at full length, in the bottom of the
chamber, near the main door; and the former king must be clad in armor, like the
Ghost, and hang at the side where it enters. I could wish that the figure held its
right hand in a commanding attitude, were somewhat turned away, and, as it
were, looked over its shoulder, that so it might perfectly resemble the Ghost at
the moment when he issues from the door. It will produce a great effect, when at
this instant Hamlet looks upon the Ghost, and the Queen upon the picture. The
stepfather may be painted in royal ornaments, but not so striking.”
There were several other points of this sort, about which we shall, perhaps,
elsewhere have opportunity to speak.
“Are you, then, inexorably bent on Hamlet’s dying at the end?” inquired
Serlo.
“How can I keep him alive,” said Wilhelm, “when the whole play is pressing
him to death? We have already talked at large on that matter.”
“But the public wishes him to live.”
“I will show the public any other complaisance; but, as to this, I cannot. We
often wish that some gallant, useful man, who is dying of a chronical disease,
might yet live longer. The family weep, and conjure the physician; but he cannot
stay him: and no more than this physician can withstand the necessity of nature,
can we give law to an acknowledged necessity of art. It is a false compliance
with the multitude, to raise in them emotions which they wish, when these are
not emotions which they ought, to feel.”
“Whoever pays the cash,” said Serlo, “may require the ware according to his
liking.”
“Doubtless, in some degree,” replied our friend; “but a great public should be
reverenced, not used as children are, when pedlers wish to hook the money from
them. By presenting excellence to the people, you should gradually excite in
them a taste and feeling for the excellent; and they will pay their money with
double satisfaction when reason itself has nothing to object against this outlay.
The public you may flatter, as you do a well-beloved child, to better, to
enlighten, it; not as you do a pampered child of quality, to perpetuate the error
you profit from.”
In this manner various other topics were discussed relating to the question,
What might still be changed in the play, and what must of necessity remain
untouched? We shall not enter farther on those points at present; but, perhaps, at
some future time we may submit this altered “Hamlet” itself to such of our
readers as feel any interest in the subject.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |