Cutting- edge science

CUTTING- EDGE SCIENCE
August | 2020
SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS AND REFLECTION OF THE
PSYCHOLOGICAL STATE OF THE SPEAKER IN THE SPEECH.
Akbarova Zukhra Akmaljonovna - candidate of philological sciences, associate
professor
Nazirjonova Farangiz Sukhrob kizi - student
Fergana state university
Abstract.The article reflects relationship between psychological state and socio-philosophical
views, as well as the influence of these relations on the process of the speech activity of the
speaker.
Keywords: the speaking subject, external and internal speech, the structure of speech, the
sociality of the language
Communication arises from the needs of the speaker, so it is the main object. At the
beginning of the conversation is the speaker. It is this speaking individual who acts in the
form of two individuals, not one individual, in the process of preparing and speaking. In
other words, there are two individuals in the same person. The speaker first speaks to
himself, that is, exchanges ideas, works again and again. From this point of view, the
speaking individual is an object consisting of two people as an addressee. When the
speaker speaks to the "I" and hears his opinion, he expresses it to another, that is, to
another object that is the addressee. So the communication process is also a complex
process.
The speaker is a subject who expresses his speech based on a specific society, the
social environment in which he lives, his personal views and psychological state.
Depending on the content of the speech, the speaker first addresses himself. Accordingly,
this process involves three objects. In this case, the subject has two objects of its own -
the external "I" and the internal "I"; the third object is outside the "own" - the object to
which the reference is addressed.
While the socio-philosophical views of the speaker are reflected in the attitude to the
psychological state of the other, the activity of the mind in the same situation plays a
decisive role. Human thinking does not stop even in the process of speech, it is
constantly working. "The human mind is not haram, but it is a workshop, and man is a
worker in it" [1,17]. The speaker, that is, the subject of the appeal, thinks and judges
within the limits of his consciousness, which is "grown" in this workshop. In this case,
1) the verdict of appeal or not, 2) the verdict of how to appeal is confirmed by the
activity of the mind, and the firm verdict, which is confirmed and stabilized, is formed
through the internal speech of the speaker-subject. Reflecting on this, V.F. Petrenko
writes that the possibility of verbal communication with other people, according to
MM Bakhtin, leads to the emergence of autocommunication, which is the basis and
mechanism of consciousness, an internal dialogue with itself, "when the mind moves,
the dialogue begins."
Whether or not speech occurs depends on the cessation of autocommunication in the
subjectý' mind. Because "thinking is especially closely connected with inner speech"
[2,457]. S.L. Rubinstein continues: "L.S. Vygodsky, who studied the features of the
internal speech structure, characterizes this speech structure as predicative" [3,457].
So, judgment is formed and realized through internal speech. This idea is also confirmed
by other great scientists. The conclusions of I. Kant and T. Gobbs were also drawn by E.N.
Panov and N.D. Artyunova, based on the views of philosophers on the sociality of
language, thought, thinking, psychological and emotional-emotional aspects. "The great

---

71