Contents introduction william Makepeace Thackeray, his early life and literary career Vanity Fair- a novel without a hero critical analysis of this novel conclusion glossary Bibliography introduction the aim of the work

Conclusion
If we say as a conclusion, this course work is about’’ William Makepeace Thackeray” and’’Vanity Fair’’. In summary, we analysed some specific information about Victorian period and the role of William Makepeace Thackeray’s’’ Vanity Fair’’ creativity.
Firstly, we are talking about major and remarkable novels by writer. There are a lot of successful and most famous writer and poets in Victorian Era. When you think of this period, really the powerful writer is Thackeray. The writer is more widely known than other Victorian writers.
Secondly glance we see that we can say that Thackeray is the powerful and talented representative of Victorian age. we enjoyed reading about Amelia and Becky for the most part.
The last few sentences of the quotation demonstrate that the narrator expects the reader not to form any impressions or opinions without his say-so. Don’t you worry your pretty little heads trying to figure things out, the narrator implies, I’ll tell you what to think and when to think it from here on out.
Thirdly, we personally would have liked to see them end up together, but we guess we can accept things played out. It is impossible to say who is the narrator in the extract, the conclusion may be made that the narration is new.
Next, the narrator turns to give us the real scoop on this Amelia character. She turns out to be "fully worthy of the praises" of Miss Pinkerton. How do we know the narrator is telling the truth? Because he s not the kind of person who compliments without merit. Miss Pinkerton, for instance, he calls a "pompous old Minerva," showing us that he can call it like he sees it at all times.
Finally, at the end of the book Rebecca has the money necessary to live in Vanity Fair; she appears to be respectable. William has won Amelia. Rebecca has been the one who jolted Amelia into recognition that George, her first love, wasn’t worthy.
Thackeray’s narrator usually functions as our worldly and semi-jaded guide through the social world of the novel. Thackeray explained own feeling in his novels. He enjoyed his income, nonetheless, for it permitted him to live in considerable comfort and to eat well. At the beginning of my work, we observed all the information about’’ Vanity Fair’’.
We want to start out by saying that we usually love Victorian literature. But we found Vanity Fair, to be an incredibly, unsympathetic characters and a setting that was difficult to visualize. We’ll concede that not being able to understand the political happenings that comprised the background of the story was entirely my fault, as the author couldn’t possibly be expected to explain every little detail. However, Thackeray is entirely responsible for the uninteresting characters and dull plotlines. Thackeray explained own feeling in his novels. He enjoyed his income, nonetheless, for it permitted him to live in considerable comfort and to eat well. At the beginning of my work, we observed all the information about ''Vanity Fair”.
In shortly saying, there are more benefits to the study of literature.