Bibliography on intellectual history methodologies

The Divided Heart. Essays on Protestantism and the Enlightenment in America, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press

Russel Jacoby, “A New Intellectual History?”, American Historical Review, April 1992, pp. 405-424

Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Its Ways”, American Historical Review, April 1992, pp. 425-439

Mark Bevir, “The Errors of Linguistic Contextualism”, History and Theory, vol. 31, 1992, pp. 276-98

J.G.A. Pocock, ”A discourse of sovereignty: observations on the work in progress”, in Nicholas Phillipson & Quentin Skinner, Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (essays in honor of J.G.A. Pocock), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993

Gerald N. Izenberg, ”Text, Context, and Psychology in Intellectual History”, chap. 3 in Henry Kozicki (ed.), Developments in Modern Historiography, Houndmills & London: Macmillan

Frans Gregersen & Simo Køppe, “Indledning til idehistorien”, in Gregersen & Køppe, Idehistorie, vol. 1, Amanda 1994

Robert Mayhew, ”Contextualizing Practice in Intellectual History”, Journal of Historical Geography, vol. 20, no. 3, 1994, pp. 323-328

Lennart Olausson (ed.), Idéhistoriens egenheter. Teori- och metodproblem inom idéhistorien, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1994

• 
  Lennart Olausson, ”Från text till text”
  
• 
  Bernt Skovdahl, “Idéhistoria och källkritik”
  
• 
  Staffan Carlshamre, ”Sant eller intressant? Filosofi och idéhistoria”
  
• 
  Jonas Anshelm & Martin Kylhammar, ”Om behovet av samverkan mellan idéhistoria och litteraturvetenskap”
  
• 
  Bosse Holmqvist, ”Om relativism”
  
• 
  Lennart Olausson, ”Kunnskapssociologi och idéhistoria”
  
• 
  Tomas Jonsson, “Et antinomiskt ideologibegrepp”
  

Knud Haakonssen, “The History of Ideas”, in Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy from Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1995

Suzanne Marchand, “Problems and Prospects for Intellectual History”, New German Critique, vol. 65, 1995, pp. 87-96

Max Edling & Ulf Mörkenstam, “Quentin Skinner: From Historian of Ideas to Political Scientist”, Scandinavian Political Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, 1995, pp. 119-132

Melvin Richter, The History of Political and Social Concepts. A Critical Introduction, New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995

James D. Faubion (ed.), Michel Foucault. Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984, vol. 2: Aesthetics (part 2: Methodology and Epistemology), London: Penguin 1996

John Dunn, “The History of Political Theory”, chap. 2 in Dunn, The History of Political Theory and other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996

Uffe Østergård & Jan Ifversen (eds.), Begreb og historie, Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet 1996

• 
  Jan Ifversen, ”Hvordan analysere demokrati i tale?”
  
• 
  Uffe Østergaard & Jan Ifversen, ”Europæisk civilisation, begrebshistorie og diskursanalyse”
  

Hartmut Lehmann & Melvin Richter, The Meaning of Historical Terms and Concepts. New Studies on Begriffsgeschichte, Washington: German Historical Institute 1996

• 
  Melvin Richter, “Appreciating a Contemporary Classic: The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe and Future Scholarship
  
• 
  James van Horn Melton, “Otto Brunner and the Ideological Origins of Begriffsgeschichte”
  
• 
  Donald R. Kelley, “On the Margins of Begriffsgeschichte”
  
• 
  Gabriel Motzkin, “On Koselleck’s Intuition of Time in History”
  
• 
  J.G.A. Pocock, “Concepts and Discourses: A Difference in Culture? Comment on a Paper by Melvin Richter”
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “A Response to Comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”
  

Reinhart Koselleck, “The Temporalisation of Concepts”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 1997, pp. 16-24

William W. Fisher, “Texts and Contexts: The Application to American Legal History of the Methodologies of Intellectual History”, Stanford Law Review, vol. 49, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1065-1110

Robert W. T. Martin, “Context and Contradiction: Toward a Political Theory of Conceptual Change”, Political Research Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 2, 1997, pp. 413-436

Jay M. Smith, “No More Language Games: Words, Beliefs, and the Political Culture of Early Modern France”, American Historical Review, vol. 102, no. 5, 1997, pp. 1413-1440

Kari Palonen, ”Quentin Skinner’s Rhetoric of Conceptual Change”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, 1997, pp. 61-80

Kari Palonen, “An Application of Conceptual History to Itself”, Redescriptions, 1997, pp. 39-69

Michael Freeden, “Editorial: Ideologies and conceptual history”, Journal of Political Ideologies, vol. 2, no. 1, 1997, pp. 3-11

Gad Prudovsky, “Can We Ascribe to Past Thinkers Copncepts They Had no Linguistic Means to Express?”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, 1997, pp. 15-31

Mark Bevir, “Mind and Method in the History of Ideas”, History and Theory, vol. 36, no. 2, 1997, pp. 167-189

Roger Chartier, On the Edge of the Cliff. History, Language and Practices, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1997

D.R. Woolf, “The Writing of Early Modern European Intellectual History, 1945-1995”, in Michael Bentley (ed.), Companion to Historiography, London & New York: Routledge 1997

J. Gunnell, “Time and Interpretation: Understanding Concepts and Conceptual Change”, History of Political Thought, vol. 19, 1998, pp. 641-658

Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree (eds.), History of Concepts – Comparative Perspectives, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press 1998

• 
  Iain Hampsher-Monk, Karin Tilmans & Frank van Vree , ”A Comparative Perspective on Conceptual History – An Introduction”
  
• 
  Pim den Boer, “The Historiography of German Geistesgeschichte and the Dutch Project of Conceptual History”
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “Social History and Begriffsgeschichte”
  
• 
  Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Speech Acts, Languages or Conceptual History?”
  
• 
  Hans Erich Bödeker, “Concept – Meaning – Discourse. Begriffsgeschichte Reconsidered”
  
• 
  Maurizio Viroli, “The Origin and the Meaning of the Reason of State”
  
• 
  Terence Ball, “Conceptual History and the History of Political Thought”
  
• 
  Bernhard F. Scholz, “Conceptual History in Context: Reconstructing the Terminology of an Academic Discipline”
  
• 
  Willem Frijhoff, “Conceptual History, Social History and Cultural History: The test of ‘Cosmopolitism’”
  
• 
  Hans-Jürgen Lüsebrink, “Conceptual History and Conceptual Transfer: The Case of ‘Nation’ in Revolutionary France and Germany”
  
• 
  Bram Kempers, “Words, Images and All the Pope’s Men. Raphael’s Stanza della Segnatura and the Synthesis of Divine Wisdom”
  
• 
  Eddy de Jongh, “Painted Words in Dutch Art of the Seventeenth Century”
  
• 
  Rolf Reichardt, “Historical Semantics and Political Iconography: The case of the Game of the French Revolution (1791/92)”
  
• 
  Martin van Gelderen, “Between Cambridge and Heidelberg: Concepts, Languages and Images in Intellectual History”
  

Martin Jay, “European Intellectual History and the Specter of Multiculturalism”, in Jay, Cultural Semantics. Keywords of Our Time, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press 1998

Terence Ball, “Political Argument and Conceptual Change”, in Ball, Transforming Political Discourse. Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1998

Jerry Z. Muller, “Begriffsgeschichte: Origins and Prospects”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 3-7

Hayden White, “Literary Theory and Historical Writing”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

Hayden White, “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth in Historical Representation”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

Hayden White, “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation”, in White, Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

Mark Bevir, The Logic of the History of Ideas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

James Schmidt, “How Historical is Begriffsgeschichte?”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 9-14

Janet Coleman, “The Practical Use of Begriffsgeschichte”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 28-40

Kari Palonen, “Rhetorical and Temporal Perspectives on Conceptual Change. Theses on Quentin Skinner and Reinhart Koselleck”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 41-59

Quentin Skinner, “Rhetoric and Conceptual Change”, Redescriptions, vol. 3, 1999, pp. 60-73

David Armitage, “Answering the Call: The History of Political and Social Concepts in English”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 15-22

Daniel Gordon, “Modernity and its Discontents: Some Critical Thoughts on Conceptual History”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 23-29

Melvin Richter, “Reply to Comments”, History of European Ideas, vol. 25, 1999, pp. 31-37

P.J. Kelly, “Contextual and Non-Contextual Histories of Political Thought”, in Jack Hayward, Brian Barry & Archie Brown (eds.), The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999

Nils Andersson & Henrik Björck (eds.), Vad är idéhistoria? Perspektiv på ämnets identitet under sextio år, Stockholm: Brutus Östlings Bokförlag 1999

Siep Stuurman, ”The Canon of the History of Political Thought: Its Critique and a Proposed Alternative”, History and Theory, vol. 39, 2000, pp. 147-166

Mark Bevir, “The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 295-300

Kari Palonen, “Logic or Rhetoric in the History of Political Thought? Comments on Mark Bevir”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 301-310

Siep Stuurman, “On Intellectual Innovation and the Methodology of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 311-319

F.R. Ankersmit, “Comments on Bevir’s The Logic of the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 321-331

Allan Megill, “Imagining the History of Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 333-340

Mark Bevir, “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Power: A Response to Critics”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 341-350

Mark Bevir and Frank Ankersmit, “Exchanging Ideas”, Rethinking History, vol. 4, no. 3, 2000, pp. 351-372

Mark Bevir, “Begriffsgeschichte”, History and Theory, vol. 39, no. 2, 2000, pp. 273-284

Erland Mårald, “Idéhistoria ur ett världshistoriskt perspektiv”, i Mohammad Fazlhashemi, Anders Öckerman & Ronny Ambjörnsson (eds.), Vidgade vyer. Globalt perspektiv på idéhistoria, Lund: Studentlitteratur 2000

Mark Bevir, “The Text as a Historical Object”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, 2000, pp. 201-222

Timothy Bahti, “Literary Criticism and the History of Ideas”, in Christa Knellwolf & Christopher Norris (eds.), Literary Criticism, vol. 9, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 33, 2001: Quentin Skinner og intellektuel historie

• 
  Tore Eriksen & Peter C. Kjærgaard, ”Quentin Skinner – fra idéhistorie til intellektuel historie”
  
• 
  Quentin Skinner, ”Moralske principper og social forandring”
  
• 
  Anthony Pagden, ”Intellektuel historie”
  
• 
  Tore Frängsmyr, ”Idéhistorie eller idéernes funktion i historien”
  
• 
  Thomas Krogh, ”Quentin Skinner og problemer i at skrive den politiske tænknings historie”
  
• 
  Hans-Jørgen Schanz, ”Intellektuel historie som genre og disciplin”
  
• 
  Victoria Höög, ”Historiens tvetydighed: Quentin Skinner og problematiseringen af traditionen”
  

Duncan Forbes, “Aesthetic thoughts on doing the history of ideas”, History of European Ideas, vol. 27, 2001, pp. 101-113

Peter J. Boettke, “F.A. Hayek as an intellectual historian of economics”, chap. 7 in Steven G. Medema & Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London & New York: Routledge 2001

Geoffrey Gilbert, “Donald Winch as intellectual historian”, chap. 18 in Steven G. Medema & Warren J. Samuels (eds.), Historians of Economics and Economic Thought, London & New York: Routledge 2001

Duncan Bell, “The Cambridge School and world politics: critical theory, history and conceptual change”, 2001, www.theglobalsite.ac.uk

Eckhart Hellmuth & Christoph von Ehrenstein, “Intellectual History Made in Britain: Die Cambridge School und ihre Kritiker”, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 27, 2001, pp. 149-172

Daniel Wickberg, “Intellectual History vs. the Social History of Intellectuals”, Rethinking History, vol. 5, no. 3, 2001, pp. 383-395

Dominick LaCapra, Writing History, Writing Trauma, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 2001

David Runciman, “History of Political Thought: The State of the Discipline”, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 3, no. 1, 2001, pp. 84-104

Iain Hampsher-Monk, “The History of Political Thought and the Political History of Thought”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Melvin Richter, “A German Version of the ‘Linguistic Turn’: Reinhart Koselleck and the History of Political and Social Concepts (Begriffsgeschichte)”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Quentin Skinner, “The Rise of, Challenge to and Prospects for a Collingwoodian Approach to the History of Political Thought”, in Dario Castiglione & Iain Hampsher-Monk, The History of Political Thought in National Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001

Donald R. Kelley, “Eclecticism and the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 62, no. 4, 2001, pp. 577-592

F. Oz-Salzberger, “Intellectual History”, in Neil J. Smelser (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam & New York: Elsevier 2001, pp. 7605-7612

Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Redaktørenes forord”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.), Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 1, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

Trond Berg Eriksen & Øystein Sørensen, ”Tusen års tankeliv”, in Eriksen & Sørensen (eds.), Norsk Idéhistorie, vol. 6, Oslo: Aschehoug 2001

Jason David BeDuhn, “The historical assessment of speech acts: clarification of Austin and Skinner for the study of religions”, Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, vol. 14, 2002, pp. 84-113

Donald R. Kelley, The Descent of Ideas. The History of Intellectual History, Aldershot: Ashgate 2002

History of European Ideas, vol. 28, no 1-2, 2002: Mark Bevir and the Logic of the History of Ideas: A Symposium

• 
  Robert Stern, “History, meaning and interpretation: a critical response to Bevir”, pp. 1-12
  
• 
  Hugh Rayment-Pickard, “Derrida and fidelity to history”, pp. 13-20
  
• 
  James Martin, “The political logic of discourse: a neo-Gramscian view”, pp. 21-31
  
• 
  Melissa Lane, “Why the History of Ideas at all?”, pp. 33-41
  
• 
  Alun Munslow, “Objectivity and the writing of history”, pp. 43-50
  
• 
  R.M. Burns, “Language, tradition, and self in the generation of meaning”, pp. 51-75
  
• 
  Jane Garnett, “Whose logic? Reflections on gender in the history of ideas”, pp. 77-82
  
• 
  Mark Bevir, “Clarifications”, pp. 83-100
  
• 
  Brian Yong, “The tyranny of the definite article: Some thoughts on the art of intellectual history”, 101-117
  

Reinhart Koselleck, The Practice of Conceptual History. Timing History, Spacing Concepts, Stanford: Stanford University Press 2002

Peter Burke, “Context in Context”, Common Knowledge, vol. 8, no. 1, 2002, pp. 152-177

Kari Palonen, “The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing. Quentin Skinner's and Reinhart Koselleck's Subversion of Normative Political Theory”, European Journal of Political Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, 2002, pp. 91-106

Sandro Chignola, “History of political thought and the history of political concepts: Koselleck's proposal and Italian research”, History of Political Thought, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 517-541

Petri Koikkalainen & Sami Syrjämäki, “Interview: Quentin Skinner on Encountering the Past”, Redescriptions. Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought, no. 6, 2002, pp. 34-63

Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History and Cultural History: The Inside and the Outside”, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 15, no. 2, 2002, pp. 1-19

Quentin Skinner, Visions of Politics, vol. 1: Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002

Hans Erich Bödeker (ed.), Begriffgeschichte, Diskursgeschichte, Metapherngeschichte, Göttingen: Wallstein 2002

• 
  Hans Erich Bödeker, “Ausprägungen der historischen Semantik in den historiscen Kulturwissenschaften”
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “Hinweise auf die temporalen Strukturen begriffsgeschichtlichen Wandels”
  
• 
  Ulrich Ricken, “Zum Verhältnis vergleichender Begriffsgeschichte und vergleichender Lexikologie”
  
• 
  Hans Erich Bödeker, ”Reflexionen über Begriffsgeschichte als Methode”
  
• 
  Jacques Guilhaumou, “L’historie linguistique des usages conceptuels à l’épreuve des événements linguistiques”
  
• 
  Mark Bevir, “The Role of Contexts in Understanding and Explanation”
  
• 
  Rüdiger Zill, “Substrukturen des Denkens. Grenzen und Perspektiven einer Metapherngeschichte nach Hans Blumenberg”
  
• 
  Lutz Danneberg: ”Sinn und Unsinn einer Metapherngeschichte”
  

Richard Macksey, “The History of Ideas at 80”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 117, no. 5, 2002, pp. 1083-1097

Annabel Brett, “What is Intellectual History Now?”, in David Cannadine (ed.), What is History Now?, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan 2002

Duncan S.A. Bell, “Language, Legitimacy, and the Project of Critique”, Alternatives, vol. 27, 2002, pp. 327-350

Jan Ifversen, “Text, Discourse, Concept: Approaches to Textual Analysis”, Kontur, no. 7, 2003, pp. 60-69

Jussi Kurunmäki & Kari Palonen (eds.), Zeit, Geschichte und Politik. Time, History and Politics. Zum achtzigsten Geburtstag von Reinhart Koselleck, Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press 2003

• 
  Wolf-Dieter Narr und Kari Palonen, ”Zeit, Zeitlichkeit und Geschichte – sperrige Reflexionen. Reinhart Koselleck im Gespräch”
  
• 
  Patricia Springborg, ”What can we say about history? Modernity and historical consciousness”
  
• 
  Björn Wittrock, “Cultural crystallisation and conceptual change. Modernity, axiality and meaning in history”
  

Melvin Richter, ”Toward a Lexicon of European Political and Legal Concepts: A Comparison of Begriffsgeschichte and the ‘Cambridge School’”, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2003, pp. 91-120

Herfried Münkler, “Politische Ideengeschichte”, in Münkler (ed.), Politikwissenschaft. Ein Grundkurs, Hamburg: Rohwolt 2003

Kari Palonen, Quentin Skinner – History, Politics, Rhetoric, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003

David Boucher & Paul Kelly, “Introduction”, in Boucher & Kelly (eds.), Political Thinkers from Socrates to the Present, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003

Jan Ifversen, “Om den tyske begrebshistorie”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 18-34

Per Mouritsen, ”Hvorfor idéhistorie – og hvordan?”, Politologiske Studier, no. 1, 2003, pp. 8-17

Trond Berg Eriksen, Hva er Idéhistorie, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 2003

Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen (eds.), Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra? Tematiske og teoretiske brytninger i idéhistoriefaget, Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget 2003

• 
  Sven Arntzen & Otto M. Christensen:,“Hvor kommer idéhistorien fra”
  
• 
  Dorthe Jørgensen, ”Hvad er idéhistorie?”
  
• 
  Trond Berg Eriksen, ”Hvad kan idéhistorikere si om Norge?”
  
• 
  Nils Gilje, ”Idéhistorie og folkekultur i den tidlig moderne perioden”
  
• 
  Knut Ove Eliassen, ”En lav opplysning?”
  
• 
  Sverre Bagge, ”Fra jordlapp og pengestykke til mentalitet og diskurs. Historiens forhold til idéhistorien”
  
• 
  Victoria Höög, ”Idéhistoria och den klassiska bildungstraditionen. Refleksioner över humanioras framtid i det senmoderna samhället”
  
• 
  Sven Arntzen, ”Arthur O. Lovejoy og idéhistorien”
  
• 
  Arthur O. Lovejoy, ”Studiet av idéhistorien”
  

Alan Finlayson, “Political Science, Political Ideas and Rhetoric”, Economy and Society, vol. 33, no. 4, 2004, pp. 528-549

“Editorial”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1-2

Kjetil Jakobsen, “Intellektuel historie og de intellektuelles historie”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 15-25

Thomas Krogh, ”Idéhistorien og andre historier”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 27-33

H.O. Christophersen, ”Noen bemerkninger om idéhistoriens innhold og metode”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 39-45

Ingrid Markussen, ”På sporet af ideer”, ARR, no. 4, 2004, pp. 83-91

Lloyd Kramer, “Intellectual History and Philosophy”, Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1, no. 1, 2004, pp. 81-95

Carolyn Dean, “Intellectual History and the Prominence of Things that Matter”, Rethinking History, vol. 8, no. 4, 2004, pp. 537-547

Elizabeth A. Clark, “The New Intellectual History” + “Texts and Contexts, chaps. 6-7 in Clark, History, Theory, Text. Historians and the Linguistic Turn, Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press 2004

Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, New York: Columbia University Press 2004

Sverker Sörlin, “Världens ordning”, in Sörlin, Världens ordning. Europas idéhistoria 1492-1918, Stockholm: Natur och Kultur 2004

Donald R. Kelley, “Intellectual History in a Global Age”,