Bibliography on intellectual history methodologies

BIBLIOGRAPHY ON INTELLECTUAL HISTORY METHODOLOGIES

Compiled by Mikkel Thorup (August 2013)

Please feel free to circulate.

Any corrections or suggestions to the list can be made to [e-mail].

The principle for inclusion on the list is texts dealing with methodological aspects of intellectual history and/or intellectual historians. The principle of presentation is chronology.

Journals

• 
  Lychnos. An annual for history of ideas and science, 1936-
  
• 
  Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940-
  
• 
  Intellectual History Newsletter, 1979-2002
  
• 
  History of European Ideas, 1980-
  
• 
  Slagmark – tidsskrift for idéhistorie, 1983-
  
• 
  ARR, 1989-
  
• 
  Intellectual History Review, 1996-
  
• 
  The European Legacy, 1996-
  
• 
  Redescriptions, 1997-
  
• 
  History of Intellectual Culture, 2001-
  
• 
  Partial Answers. Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 2003-
  
• 
  Modern Intellectual History, 2004-
  
• 
  Contributions, 2005-
  
• 
  Ideas in History, 2006-
  
• 
  Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, 2007-
  
• 
  Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 2012-
  

Literature

• 
  Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being. A Study of the History of an Idea, Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard University Press 1936
  
• 
  Arthur O. Lovejoy, “The Historiography of Ideas”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol. 78, no. 4, 1938, pp. 529-543
  
• 
  R.G. Collingwood, An Autobiography, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  
• 
  Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 1, no. 1, 1940, pp. 3-23
  
• 
  R.G. Collingwood, The Idea of History, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946
  
• 
  Franklin L. Baumer, “Intellectual History and its Problems”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 21, no. 3, 1949, pp. 191-203
  
• 
  John Higham, “The Rise of American Intellectual History”, American Historical Review, April, 1951, pp. 453-471
  
• 
  George Boas et.al., Studies in Intellectual History, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1953
  
• 
  Peter Laslett, “Introduction”, in John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1960
  
• 
  Crane Brinton, “Introduction”, in Brinton, Ideas and Men. The Story of Western Thought, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1963, 2. ed.
  
• 
  Maurice Mandelbaum, “The History of Ideas, Intellectual History, and the History of Philosophy”, History and Theory, 1965, pp. 33-66
  
• 
  R.S. Crane, “Philosophy, Literature, and the History of Ideas”, in Crane, The Idea of the Humanities and other Essays Critical and Historical, vol. 1, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press 1967
  
• 
  Peter Gay, “The Social History of Ideas: Ernst Cassirer and After”, in Kurt H. Wolff & Barrington Moore (eds.), The Critical Spirit. Essays in Honor of Herbert Marcuse, Boston: Beacon Press 1967
  
• 
  Louis O. Mink, “Change and Causality in the History of Ideas”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 1968, pp. 7-25
  
• 
  Johannes Sløk, Hvad er idehistorie? Et programskrift, København: Gyldendal 1968
  
• 
  John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, Philosophy, April 1968, pp. 85-103
  
• 
  Johannes Sløk, Fylde eller tomhed, København: Gyldendal 1968
  
• 
  Georg Boas, The History of ideas. An Introduction, New York: Charles Schribner’s Sons
  
• 
  Klaus von Beyme, Politische Ideengeschichte. Probleme eines interdisziplinären Forschungsbereiches, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) 1969
  
• 
  John Higham, “Part II: Polarities in Intellectual History, chap. 2. Intellectual History and its Neighbors; 3. The Study of American Intellectual History”, in Higham, Writing American History. Essays on Modern Scholarship, Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press 1970
  
• 
  Felix Gilbert, “Intellectual History: Its Aims and Methods”, in Gilbert & Stephen R. Graubard (eds.), Historical Studies Today, New York: W.W. Norton & Co 1972
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “Einleitung”, in Otto Brunner, Werner Conze & Reinhart Koselleck (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vol. 1, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1972
  
• 
  Hayden White, The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1973
  
• 
  Philip P. Wiener, “Towards Commemorating the Centenary of Arthur O. Lovejoy’s Birthday (October 10, 1873)”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 34, no. 4, 1973, pp. 591-598
  
• 
  Philip P. Wiener, “Preface”, in Wiener (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas, New York: Charles Schribner 1973
  
• 
  F. E. L. Priestly, “Mapping the World of Ideas. Review of the Dictionary of the History of Ideas”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 35, 1973, pp. 527-537
  
• 
  Gordon J. Schochet, “Quentin Skinner’s Method”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 261-276
  
• 
  Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action”, Political Theory, vol. 2, no. 3, 1974, pp. 277-303
  
• 
  Masao Maruyama, Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan, Princeton University Press 1974 [1940-44], “Introduction”
  
• 
  Gerald Izenberg, “Psychohistory and Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 14, 1975, pp. 139-155
  
• 
  Arnaldo Momigliano, “A Piedmontese View of the History of Ideas”, in Momigliano, Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography, Oxford: Basil Blackwell 1977
  
• 
  Michel Foucault, “History of Systems of Thought”, in Donald F. Bouchard (ed.), Michel Foucault. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. Selected Essays and Interviews, Ithaca & New York: Cornell University Press 1977
  
• 
  Sande Cohen, “Structuralism and the Writing of Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 17, nr. 2, 1978, s. 175-206
  
• 
  Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1978
  
• 
  Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”, in Georg G. Iggers & Harold T. Parker (eds.), International Handbook of Historical Studies, Westport, Ct.: Metheuen 1979
  
• 
  John Higham & Paul K. Conkin (eds.), New Directions in American Intellectual History, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1979
  
  • 
    Laurence Veysey, “Intellectual History and the New Social History”
    
  • 
    Gordon S. Wood, “Intellectual History and the Social Sciences”
    
  • 
    David A. Hollinger, “Historians and the Discourse of Intellectuals”
    
  • 
    Rush Welter, On Studying the National Mind”
    
  • 
    Sacvan Bercovitch, “New England’s Errand Reappraised”
    
  • 
    Henry F. May, “Intellectual History and Religious History”
    
  • 
    Dorothy Ross, “The Liberal Tradition Revisited and the Republican Tradition Addressed”
    
  • 
    Thomas L. Haskell, “Deterministic Implications of Intellectual History”
    
  • 
    Murray G. Murphey, “The Place of Beliefs in Modern Culture”
    
  • 
    David D. Hall, “The World of Print and Collective Mentality in Seventeenth-Century New England”
    
  • 
    Thomas Bender, “The Cultures of Intellectual Life: The City and the Professions”
    
  • 
    Neil Harris, “Iconography and Intellectual History: the Half-Tone Effect”
    
  • 
    Warren I. Susman, “’Personality’ and the Making of Twentieth-Century Culture”
    
• 
  John Dunn, “The Identity of the History of Ideas”, in Dunn, Political Obligation in its Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1980
  
• 
  Daniel J. Wilson, Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Quest for Intelligibility, N.C: Chapel Hill 1980
  
• 
  Robert Darnton, “Intellectual and Cultural History”, chap. 14 in Michael Kammen (ed.), The Past Before Us. Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1980
  
• 
  William J. Bouwsma, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: From the History of Ideas to the History of Meaning”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 279-291
  
• 
  J.G.A. Pocock, “The Reconstruction of Discourse: Towards the Historiography of Political Thought”, Modern Language Notes, vol. 96, no. 5, 1981, pp. 959-980
  
• 
  Michel Foucault, “The Order of Discourse”, in Robert Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, Boston, London & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Pail 1981
  
• 
  Joel Colton, “Intellectual History in the 1980s: The Case for the Defense”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 12, no. 2, 1981, pp. 293-298
  
• 
  J.G.A. Pocock, “Afterword: The Machiavellian Moment Revisited: A Study in History and Ideology”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 53, 1981, pp. 49-72
  
• 
  Ernst Schulin, “German ‘Geistesgeschichte’, American ‘Intellectual History’ and French ‘Historie des Mentalités’ since 1900. A Comparison”, History of European Ideas, vol. 1, no. 3, 1981, pp. 195-214
  
• 
  Dominick LaCapra & Steven L. Kaplan (eds.), Modern European Intellectual History. Reappraisals and New Perspectives, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1982
  
  • 
    Roger Chartier, “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French Trajectories”
    
  • 
    Dominick LaCapra, “Rethinking Intellectual History and Reading Texts”
    
  • 
    Martin Jay, “Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn? Reflections on the Habermas-Gadamer Debate”
    
  • 
    Hans Kellner, “Triangular Anxieties: The Present State of European Intellectual History”
    
  • 
    Mark Poster, “The Future According to Foucault: The Archeology of Knowledge and Intellectual History”
    
  • 
    E.M. Henning, “Archeology, Deconstruction, and Intellectual History”
    
  • 
    Keith Michael Baker, “On the Problem of the Ideological Origins of the French Revolution”
    
  • 
    Peter Jelavich, “Popular Dimensions of Modernist Elite Culture: The Case of Theater in Fin-de-Siècle Munich”
    
  • 
    David James Fisher, “Reading Freud’s Civilization and Its Discontents”
    
  • 
    Hayden White, “Method and Ideology in Intellectual History: The Case of Henry Adams”
    
• 
  Dominick LaCapra, Rethinking Intellectual History. Texts, Contexts, Language, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1983
  
• 
  Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Defining the Present as ‘Postmodern’”, in Ihab Hassan & Sally Hassan (eds.), Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1983
  
• 
  Stefano Collini, Donald Winch & John Burrow, “The Governing Science: Things Political and the Intellectual Historian”, in Collini, Winch & Burrow, That Noble Science of Politics. A Study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983
  
• 
  Preston King (ed.), The History of Ideas. An Introduction to Method, London & Canberra: Croom Helm 1983
  
  • 
    Preston King, “Introduction”
    
  • 
    Preston King, “Thinking Past a Problem”
    
  • 
    Michael Oakeshott, “The Activity of Being an Historian”
    
  • 
    Preston King, “Michael Oakeshott and Historical Particularism”
    
  • 
    R.G. Collingwood, “The Historical Logic of Question and Answer”
    
  • 
    Leo Strauss, “On Collingwood’s Philosophy of History”
    
  • 
    A.O. Lovejoy, “The Study of the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Maurice Mandelbaum, “On Lovejoy’s Historiography”
    
  • 
    Leo Strauss, “Political Philosophy and History”
    
  • 
    John G. Gunnell, “The Myth of the Tradition”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts”
    
  • 
    Preston King, “The Theory of Context and the Case of Hobbes”
    
• 
  John Patrick Diggins, “The Oyster and the Pearl: The Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual History”, History and Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 1984, pp. 151-169
  
• 
  Iain Hampsher-Monk, “Political Languages in Time: The Work of J.G.A. Pocock”, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 14, 1984, pp. 159-174
  
• 
  Richard Rorty, “The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres”, in Rorty, J.B. Schneewind & Quentin Skinner, Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984
  
• 
  Peter L. Janssen, “Political Thought as Traditionary Action: The Critical Response to Skinner and Pocock”, History and Theory, vol. 24, 1985, pp. 115-146
  
• 
  David Boucher, Texts in Context. Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985
  
• 
  Conal Condren, The Study and Appraisal of Classic Texts. An Essay on Political Theory, Its Inheritance, and the History of Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1985
  
• 
  Rolf Reichardt, “Einleitung”, in Reichardt & Eberhard Schmitt (eds.), Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680-1820, München: R. Oldenbourg Verlag 1985
  
• 
  Michael Ermarth, “Mindful Matters: The Empire’s New Codes and the Plight of Modern European Intellectual History”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 57, no. 3, 1985, pp. 506-527
  
• 
  Stefano Collini, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 46-48
  
• 
  Michael Biddiss , “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 49-50
  
• 
  Quentin Skinner, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 50-52
  
• 
  J.G.A. Pocock, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 52-53
  
• 
  Bruce Kuklick, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53
  
• 
  Michael Hunter, “What is Intellectual History?”, History Today, October 1985, pp. 53-54
  
• 
  J.G.A. Pocock, “Introduction: The State of the Art”, in Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History. Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1985
  
• 
  David A. Hollinger, In the American Province. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ideas, Bloomington: Indiana University Press 1985
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “Sozialgeschichte und Begriffsgeschichte”, in Wolfgang Schieder & Volker Sellin (eds.), Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland, vol. 1, Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht 1986
  
• 
  Melvin Richter, “History (Begriffsgeschichte) and Political Theory”, Political Theory, vol. 14, no. 4, 1986, pp. 604-637
  
• 
  Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 48, no. 1, 1987, pp. 143-169
  
• 
  P. & m. Kuntz (eds.), The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years, New York
  
• 
  Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s The Great Chain of Being after Fifty Years”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 187-205
  
• 
  Gladys Gordon-Bournique, “A.O. Lovejoy and the ‘History of Ideas’”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 207-210
  
• 
  Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 211-230
  
• 
  Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1987, pp. 231-245
  
• 
  John E. Toews, “Intellectual History after the Linguistic Turn: The Autonomy of Meaning and the Irreducibility of Experience”, American Historical Review, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 879-907
  
• 
  Hayden White, The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press 1987
  
• 
  Martin Jay, “Two Cheers for Paraphrase: The Confessions of a Synoptic Intellectual Historian”, in Jay, Fin de Siècle Socialism and other essays, New York & London: Routledge 1988
  
• 
  Anthony Pagden, “Rethinking the Linguistic Turn: Current Anxieties in Intellectual History”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 49, no. 3, 1988, pp. 519-529
  
• 
  Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, New York: Columbia University Press 1988
  
• 
  Roger Chartier, Cultural History. Between Practices and Representations, Cambridge: Polity Press 1988
  
• 
  James Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity 1988
  
  • 
    James Tully, “The Pen is a Mighty Sword: Quentin Skinner’s Analysis of Politics”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “’Social Meaning’ and the Explanation of Social Action”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “Language and Social Change”
    
  • 
    Martin Hollis, “Say It with Flowers”
    
  • 
    Keith Graham, “How do Illocutionary Descriptions Explain?”
    
  • 
    Joseph V. Femia, “An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for Studying”
    
  • 
    Kenneth Minogue, “Method in Intellectual History: Quentin Skinner’s Foundations”
    
  • 
    Nathan Tarcov, “Quentin Skinner’s Method and Machiavelli’s Prince”
    
  • 
    John Keane, “More Theses on the Philosophy of History”
    
  • 
    Charles Taylor, “The Hermeneutics of Conflict”
    
  • 
    Quentin Skinner, “A Reply to my Critics”
    
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “Linguistic Change and the History of Events”, Journal of Modern History, vol. 61, December 1989, pp. 649-666
  
• 
  Lloyd S. Kramer, “Literature, Criticism, and Historical Imagination: The Literary Challenge of Hayden White and Dominick LaCapra”, in Lynn Hunt (ed.), The New Cultural History, Berkeley: University of California Press 1989
  
• 
  Quentin Skinner, “Language and Political Change”, in Terence Ball, James Farr & Rusell L. Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989
  
• 
  James Farr, “Understanding Conceptual Change Politically” ”, in Terence Ball, James Farr & Rusell L. Hansen (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989
  
• 
  Dominick LaCapra, “Intellectual History and Critical Theory”, in LaCapra, Soundings in Critical Theory, Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press 1989
  
• 
  Kack Liveley & Andrew Reeve, “General Introduction”, in Liveley & Reeve (eds.), Modern Political Theory from Hobbes to Marx. Key Debates, London & New York: Routledge 1989
  
• 
  David Harlan, “Intellectual History and the Return of Literature”, American Historical Review, vol. 94, 1989, pp. 581-609
  
• 
  Keith Tribe, “The Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe Project: From History of Ideas to Conceptual History. A Review Article”, Comparative Studies in Society, vol. 31, 1989, pp. 180-184
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, ”Social History and Conceptual History”, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, 1990, pp. 308-325
  
• 
  Reinhart Koselleck, “Sprogændring og begivenhedshistorie”, Den jyske historiker, vol. 50, 1990, pp. 121-135
  
• 
  Robert Darnton, The Kiss of Lamourette. Reflections on Cultural History, New York & London: W.W. Norton & Co 1990
  
• 
  Lars-Henrik Schmidt, “Den interpreterende konstruktion”, Den Jyske Historiker, no. 50, 1990, pp. 55-64
  
• 
  Fritz Ringer, ”The Intellectual Field, Intellectual History, and the Sociology of Knowledge”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 269-294
  
• 
  Charles Lemert, “The Habits of Intellectuals. Response to Ringer”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 295-310
  
• 
  Martin Jay, “Fieldwork and Theorizing in Intellectual History. A Reply to Fritz Ringer”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 311-321
  
• 
  Fritz Ringer, “Rejoinder to Charles Lemert and Martin Jay”, Theory & Society, vol. 19, 1990, pp. 323-334
  
• 
  Melvin Richter, “Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe”, History and Theory, vol. 29, no. 1, 1990, pp. 38-70
  
• 
  Donald R. Kelley, “What is Happening to the History of Ideas?”, Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 51, no. 1, 1990, pp. 3-25
  
• 
  Donald R. Kelley, The History of Ideas. Canon and Variations, Rochester: University of Rochester Press 1900
  
  • 
    Donald R. Kelley, “Introduction: Reflections on a Canon”
    
  • 
    Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reflections on the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Frederick J. Teggart, “A Problem in the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Leo Spitzer, “Geistesgeschichte vs. History of Ideas as Apllied to Hitlerism”
    
  • 
    Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Reply to Professor Spitzer”
    
  • 
    Theodore Spencer, “Lovejoy’s ‘Essays in the History of Ideas’”
    
  • 
    Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Historiography and Evaluation: A Disclaimer”
    
  • 
    Abraham Edel, “Levels of Meaning and the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Paul O. Kristeller, “The Philosophical Significance of the History of Thought”
    
  • 
    Philip P. Wiener, “Logical Significance of the History of Thought”
    
  • 
    Joseph Anthony Mazzeo, “Some Interpretations of the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Leonard Krieger, “The Autonomy of Intellectual History”
    
  • 
    Daniel J. Wilson, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Moral of ‘The Great Chain of Veing’”
    
  • 
    Kathleen E. Duffin, “Arthur O. Lovejoy and the Emergence of Novelty”
    
  • 
    Daniel J. Wilson, “Lovejoy’s ‘The Great Chain of Being’ after Fifty Years”
    
  • 
    Edward P. Mahoney, “Lovejoy and the Hierarchy of Being”
    
  • 
    Francis Oakley, “Lovejoy’s Unexplored Option”
    
  • 
    Johann Huizinga, “History Changing Form”
    
  • 
    Joseph Katz, “A Reply to J. Huizinga on the Form and Function of History”
    
  • 
    Calvin G. Rand, “Two Meanings of Historicism in the Writings of Dilthey, Troeltsch, and Meinecke”
    
  • 
    Nils B. Kvastad, “Semantics in the Methodology of the History of Ideas”
    
  • 
    Paul O. Kristeller, “’Creativity’ and ‘Tradition’”
    
  • 
    Lester G. Crocker, “Interpreting the Enlightenment: A Political Approach”
    
  • 
    Patrick H. Hutton, “The Art of Memory Reconceived: From Rhetoric to Psychoanalysis”
    
  • 
    Donald R. Kelley, “Horizons of Intellectual History: Retrospect, Circumspect, Prospect”
    
• 
  Richard Tuck, “History of Political Thought”, in Peter Burke (ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing, Cambridge: Polity Press 1991
  
• 
  Henry F. May, “Religion and American Intellectual History, 1945-1989: Reflections on an Uneasy Relationship”, chap. 1 in May,