110
contributions to circulating content – not actions to elicit responses…A contribution need not be
understood; it only need be repeated, reproduced, forwarded” (
ibid.
26-27). That anyone with a
computer or a phone can share their opinion
with the world, does not a deliberative democracy
make. More important, though, than Dean’s criticism of deliberative politics in the context of
communicative capitalism, though, is her identification of a far more pervasive problem in
democratic theory: the identification of democracy with deliberation. Whether one has in mind
orderly reason-giving or more contentious communicative acts, the result of
seeing democracy as
primarily discursive is “the reduction of politics to communicative acts, to speaking and saying
and exposing and explaining, a reduction key to democracy conceived in terms of discussion and
deliberation…[D]oing is reduce to talking, to contributing to the media environment” (
ibid.
32).
For Dean, this reduction of democracy “speaking and saying and exposing and
explaining” has serious consequences for left politics. Believing democracy to
be synonymous
with communication, she argues that activists have placed too much emphasis on the wrong
activities. Discussion, education and consciousness-raising – important as they may be – are
not
equivalent to democracy, nor are they sufficient to make political change.
That people know what corporations and governments are doing doesn’t mean
they can change them. That they are aware of a problem,
have an opinion, and
make their opinion known doesn’t mean they have developed the infrastructure
necessary to write new legislation, garner support for it, and get it passed, much
less carry out a revolution (
ibid.
32).
Instead, left politics is reduced to MoveOn style “clicktivism,” wherein “all one has to do is
contribute – an opinion,
a signature, or money” (
ibid.
46).
On my reading, Dean argues that rather than “speaking truth to (or about) power”, the left
needs to (re)learn how to actually exercise power.
15
Indeed, what is missing from this conception
15
More specifically, Dean suggests that the left should focus on “occupying military bases, taking over the
government, or abandoning the Democratic Party and doing the steady, persistent, organizational work or
111
of democracy – and, more particularly, from this brand of left politics – is an understanding of
power, both in regards to the prevalence of existing power asymmetries and
in regards to social
movement strategies that generate collective power. The popular conception of democracy as
centered on communicative acts between equals has reduced the capacity of the left to “take a
stand” for something and use collective power against the institutionalized power of state and
capital. Instead, much of the left is stuck in the “nonposition” (
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: