Бердақ номидаги қорақалпоқ давлат университети ҳузуридаги илмий даражалар берувчи phD

R.B.Ballieva
Chairman of the scientific council awarding scientific degrees, doctor of historical sciences, professor.
X.M.Otegenov
Scientific secretary of the scientific council awarding scientific degrees, PhD.
B.A.Koshanov
Chairman of the scientific seminar atthe scientific council awarding scientific degrees, doctor of historical sciences, professor.
INTRODUCTION (annotation of the dissertation of doctor of philosophy (PhD))
The aim of the research work is to shed light on the history of transformation processes in the agricultural sector in Uzbekistan in the late 20^th and early 21^st centuries, the crisis of the collective and state farm system and the emergence of various forms of ownership in agriculture.
The object of the research is the transformation processes in the agricultural sector in Uzbekistan in 1985-2016.
The scientific novelty of the research:
it was found that Uzbekistan is associated with the process of optimization of farms, which is fully implemented in agriculture in the situation that reforms in the agricultural sector and related controversial factors are divided into three historical stages, the first stage of which covers the years 1985-1997, in which the emergence of various forms of ownership in agriculture; the second stage – the conversion of arable lands of all company farms, which were initially operating at a loss in 1998-2007, into farms; the third stage, covering the years 2008-2016;
the fact that pressures such as the abolition of centuries-old private land ownership in agriculture during the years of Soviet rule, the restriction of the rights of peasants who were self-sufficient in terms of class, and the increasing pressure on hardworking peasants led to a decline in the living standards of the rural population has been shown;
sanitation measures which is based on effective use of fixed assets, working capital and bank loans in the late 20^th and early 21^st centuries to increase the profitability of collective and corporate farms, identification of additional capacities and reserves and improvement of the management structure, were not fully justified and it has been proved that at the result of it the farming movement in agriculture became widespread;
it has been grounded that implementation of transformation processes in the agricultural sector, such as the creation of healthy and diversified production structures, specialization, adaptation to market conditions led to the the emergence of different social strata and property owners, such as contractors, tenants, shareholders, farmers, farmers, gardeners, entrepreneurs, instead of classes such as rural collective and state farm workers.