|
Should children learn languages when they are younger or older?
Language has always been the main barrier among nations in understanding each other. The only way of overcoming this is learning languages. While some people decide to teach their children foreign languages when they reach a particular age, others believe it is preferable to do so no sooner is their son or daughter four or five. Personally I support earlier education based on the facts listed below.
There are a number of arguments in favour of the younger education of foreign languages. A chief is none but better attention. What I mean by this is that the younger the child is, the more eager he is to acquire and percept the outter world. As to the fact, because the language is the main method of human comunication, children find it essential in interacting with the members of family, so learn it. Once they get older, however, they will be tied up with more complex issues of wellbeing and survival. Thus, they put everything on the second, including foreign languages.
A free time is another reason to the thesis. When we were younger, we used to have more leisure time. That means that we were free from everything. Hence, we were more focused on than we are now. That is to sasy, we did not have to worry about doing school homework or goint to the nursery. There are some people who prefer learning when they get older, but they find it too challenging because of their family problems. So, it is much easier to learn languages as earlier as possible.
To sum up, I once again restate my opinion as to the facts quoted above.
The 21st century has begun. What changes do you think this new century will bring? Use examples and details in your answer.
Man, through the ages, has undergone many changes from the time when he depicted a herd of mammoths on the walls of his cave to these days when he can create beautiful pictures and even make coffee by use of computer technologies without leaving his favorite chair. The 20th century made huge steps in developing computer technologies and reached many goals that made our life much easier. What should we expect in the 21st century?
First of all, I think that the pace of our life will speed up: we will move faster from one place to another, from one continent to another using high speed jet airplanes. Second of all, I believe that we will be able to do many things that take much time now without leaving our house. Computers will be everywhere including out clothes. Many people will have chips and mini computers inserted in their heads to hold huge amount of information and have a quick access to it.
But what will be the most amazing thing in the 21st century is the flights to the outer space and Mars that will be available to all people. Scientists say that Mars has many things similar to the Earth's. Moreover, they say that with the help of modern technology people can artificially create conditions that will allow people to live there on the constant basis.
To sum up, I am sure that many amazing changes will be brought by the 21st century. Furthermore, I think that with the help of the contemporary technologies people can do many things that were even difficult to imagine a century ago. So, nowadays it is rather difficult and even impossible to imagine all changes that will happen in the next decades.
Band 9 model essay
Employers are always seeking ways to enhance their employees’ productivity, and subsidising healthy pursuits may be one way of achieving this. There are arguments on both sides, however, which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, it might be said that if workers are fitter and less stressed, their working time will be more efficient, leading to higher levels of output and service. Furthermore, the work/life balance of the staff will hopefully be improved, because their leisure time will be more fulfilling. This may even be more motivating than pay increments, perks, or financial rewards such as bonuses or incentives which may be hard to attain. Finally, feeling healthier may lead to better job satisfaction which is in itself a motivating factor.
Conversely, the problem with such leisure-based subsidies is that their efficacy is virtually impossible to quantify. For example, with target-related payments, employers can at least see whether the objectives are reached or not. It might also be said that, if this budget was spent on (for instance) on the job training or day release programmes, the employees would achieve better career progression and have better job prospects. These matters are all easier to measure, especially in performance reviews and appraisals, and may even help to reduce the risk of redundancy if the company restructures, downsizes or outsources its workforce.
Overall, it seems that, while health-related subsidies are superficially attractive, the lack of measurability is a substantial drawback. Spending funds on ongoing training would appear to be a better use of company or Human Resources budgets.
(259 words)
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |
