2.Throughout history, male leaders have led us into violence and conflict. If a society is governed by female leaders it will be more peaceful. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion In the modern world, the majority of the members of society come up with the idea that the female leaders are good managers in order to save a peace over the government. However, others hold an opinion that male leaders cannot be replaced by females. There is no denying that if the females take high positions, the ruling system of the country will be changed. However, many individuals do not believe that they can bring a peace to the government, because many wars and conflicts between the countries have happened because of women. In other words, many kinds in the middle ages have started wars because of women. A good illustration of this is the film of Troy. In this movie, a main character, a king of Troy, started a war because his wife slept with another king's son. On the other hand, some people tend to think that women are capable to bring a peace to the country. This is because, they are gentle and they are not willing to hurt someone's feelings.Accordingly, if they run the country, they can avoid violences and conflicts. For example, several governments,such as New Zeland and Croatia have been running with the female leader for a long time. Unsurprisingly, these years remain the most peaceful in the modern history of these countries. In conclusion, althoughmany people are keen to vote for women in order to reduce violence, however, this method is not a viable option, because other people believe that the main causes of wars and conflicts were women in the middle ages. 3.Some believe technology has made our lives too complex and the solution is to lead a simpler life without technology. To what extend do you agree or disagree The issue related to the complexity of technology and living without it has been heatedly debated by users in recent years. Some feel that the daily routine can be simplified excluding the technology. In my opinion, I totally disagree with those who say that technology should be reduced from life. However, the usage of technological devices without parent supervision has negative impacts on children’s education. Regarding those who hold that excluding technology can simplify life, there are many reasons. One supportive claim is that using technological devices without parent supervision can have negative impacts on children´s education. Furthermore, children are unable to manage their time using smartphones or tablets. It is also possible those parents are anti-technology because of a lack of knowledge. To illustrate, they are not able to set up a password to control the children´s initial access.Nevertheless, I firmly believe that opinion is ludicrous. The obvious reason is that technology has significant effects on people's communication. It is also possible to say that instant communication and internet mobile is vital for business interaction. Moreover, using the internet most of the students can have classes from home and employees can do home office. A typical example is in order to control the spread of Coronavirus, during the self-isolation in Canada most people are working from home using a notebook and internet. To sum up, I maintain that technological advancements are vital for social communication. The only concern is about children using cellphones and tablets without adult monitoring. Overall,technology has helped develop more advanced economies and it is recommended to the population learn and be on top of how to use then
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |