Introduction
Innovation is one of the most important aspects in most of the business organizations as they strive to attain their goals and objectives. It brings about changes in the traditional way of management to new and improved methods. All these methods will try to answer questions that are usually presented to managers regarding the value of the products and services offered these organizations (Davis& Scott, 2007). The need for to coming up with characteristics that can stimulate innovations is paramount to organization’s success. Furthermore there is need to provide a conducive environment where such innovators can thrive in. There is also the need for managers to come up with ways or effective methods that they use to differentiate priorities in terms of resource allocation (Gjerding, 2003). This paper will highlight and draw comparisons on different models and theories of innovation. The paper will also discuss the effects of different approaches to innovation process. Furthermore, the paper will also define concepts pertinent to innovation and use the concepts to illuminate on the effects of unintended consequences on the innovation process.
Discussion
As an important point of consideration, Innovation should not be taken as a mechanical procedure that can be achieved in unplanned way. It is more of an accurate systematic approach achieved through a highly crafted adaptive system. It involves resilience, hard work and dedication. Naturally, innovation in any business is achieved as a result of interplay of three successful forces. These forces are selection, variation, and replication. The managers should be aware that when Organizing for the process of innovation. A great deal of excellent awareness regarding these three forces and their individual working is required (Galunic and Eisenhardt, 2001).
Majority of the business organizations identify their need for innovation that advises them differently. Some businesses may agree on theories that make the organization to take great risks while on the other hand accept failure. Others may follow theories that create an interesting work environment. There are also theories that encourage business networking between different organizations. This allows flexibility. The reality behind coming up with these theories cum ideas is usually the need to shift from the outdated ways of conducting business. Without proper innovations, business organizations may end up making huge losses and also loss of employees to other organizations that stand the wave of innovation (Watson & Harris, 1999).
Organizations may have unique strengths and weaknesses, with regard to planning for innovation. This calls for coming up with effective ways of resource mobilization in order to support the process of innovation. After these systems are put into place, there is need to appreciating those behind the ideas and also nurturing the idea. This will ensure the survival of the idea and also the organization is assured of continued support from those behind the idea. To organizations that are dispersed in many regions or networked organizations, their ideas spread faster to consumers than their counterparts (Garvin, 1993). Innovation is defined as the use of new ideas to the products and processes, or any o other activities that may increase value to an organization. This value is usually aimed at benefiting the organization as well as its consumers. However, innovation involves two aspects; product innovation and process innovation. Product innovation generally refers to the introduction of new products or a substantial change in the already existing products. On the other hand process innovation usually refers to coming up with a new ways in processing goods and services
Product innovations involve tangible processed goods and intangible services. It can also be a both products. Mobile phones and computers provide a good example of more recent tangible goods that have impacted heavily on the lives of people both at the working places and also at home. The combination of both the tangible and Intangible products have cannot be undermined. For example intangible products are used alongside the tangible products like computer softwares and the computers themselves. The softwares are needed for the proper working of the computer. They also help in transmission of information from one person to another (Garvin, 1993).
Synchronizing the three roles of Innovation
In all successive organizations, innovation is not taken as a solitary activity but rather handled as a detailed process. This is usually assigned to particular employees who have shown commitment to innovation. These organizations view it as the end product brought about by an effective network composed of a team of individuals who clearly understand their responsibilities. There is usually support from one another during the entire process. The organization must also chip in by supporting their ideas and also recognizing their efforts. The idea should also be nurtured from its infancy. The key individual roles in the organization are the innovator, the agent of change and the gatekeeper. With the interplay of these three roles, the success of the idea is guaranteed as a result of team work (Garvin, 1993).
Role the innovators
These are the original owners of the idea that the organization is willing to undertake .they dream big and usually convert their dreams into actions. From them the ideas are said to natural or rather unexplored. These ideas may be big or small. When these ideas are brought into the right they receive a lot of scrutiny of which most is criticism. if these ideas come to happen when an organization is facing crisis especially from the competitors, they may be accepted to bring the crisis to an end. In this regard the organization is forced to take risk in order to save itself from the crisis. It takes wise decision to give into such ideas, however if the idea saves the organization then the innovator carries the day.
All these ideas brought up are for the success of the organization thus they are usually granted audience before they are thrown out. Most of these ideas however due to criticism are not granted audience and they don’t survive to see the light of the day due to negative criticism. Other innovators are not bold enough to present such ideas to the light as a result of poor or unconducive working environments in their organizations.
As a point of consideration, it should be made clear that innovators cannot come up with new ideas whenever the organization is faced with crisis. Majority of the innovations come about by mere accident rather than from point of consciousness or from deliberate responsibility (Garvin, 1993). However this is not the case in all innovations as some may arise when the organization is in dire need of them. Innovations also require good management systems from a good understanding of the key roles and functions of every part in the system. The organizations need to provide an environment where new ideas can be born and nurtured. In this environment they have a comfortable way of transferring their ideas to the gate keepers. From the networks created by the gatekeepers the innovators are made key players in the game. Innovators need to be independent and should also avoid office politics as this can influence negatively on their ideas (Butler, 1988).
The gate keepers
These are the transformers of the real idea into action. The gate keepers are usually the top managers or the employees who are usually networked both inside and outside the organization. These are the people who provide infrastructure and resources for the new idea for it to proper. This is because of the variations that are usually involved in the process of nurturing the idea. In the process of generating and nurturing the ideas, a lot of challenges are usually encountered and it is the role of the gate keepers to provide solutions to the challenges. They need to listen to all ideas presented by the innovators and chose the best of the ideas that can propel the organization to the desired direction.
The innovators need to be informed by the gate keepers that it is only the best ideas that may be put into consideration (Butler, 1988). Gate keeping of the ideas is important in all organizations as it usually assures the innovator that their ideas are going to be nurtured and will help the organization achieve its goals and objectives. Furthermore all ideas must usually pas through this process and also it is under this process that damaging variations are eliminated.
Change Agents
In all organizations there is always a wide range of people from different cultures, religions and race. All these people have different personalities and relate differently with others. An innovator may come up with a very good idea that can change the organizations but due to strained relationships among colleagues, this idea may fail to come to be. The change agents are the people who remove such barriers in the organization and actively promote new ideas. Without the change agents, good ideas from innovators may not be considered. Through the role of change agents, innovations usually spread more rapidly and establish a competitive position in the business world. This involves changing the employees’ attitudes and perceptions in order to support the new idea. Through this entire process of replication, tremendous results are witnessed on the side of the organization (Mclean, 2005). Change agents help spur innovation in an organization. However, they also open up ways for the development of many products whose effect on the society many not be entirely quantified. For instance, the development of products that might have a negative effect on its users, whether unforeseen or otherwise may result from the efforts of change agents.
Certain processes have to be followed in the innovative process. Like in the obligatory points of passage, these processes converge at the outcome of the innovative processes. However, other outcomes that were unintended might prevail. For instance, the development of certain products using a specified process might lead to the production of toxic wastes that harm the environment. Although this was highly unintended, it is a consequence of the process of innovation. The unintended consequences need not be of a negative nature. Positive unintended consequences may also arise from the process of innovation. A good example is the processing of pork. The byproducts of the processing procedure do not all go to waste. Some of them are further processed into other products that may not have been initially intended when the process was developed.
Prosperous innovations often involve variation, replication and selection. In this regard, these forces can only operate in distinct organizational settings. There has been no definite answer that can be used to put into check the interplay these forces. However a little thing can be learnt from some emerging trends in the current economy. The organization only needs to know the kind of trend that fit in its shoes. The final step for the organization is to create an environment that supports the trend (Yukl, 2006).