Хулоса ва таклифлар
Ўзбекистонда креатив фикрлашни шакллантириш қандай натижа беради?
Шуни таъкидлаш керакки, ижтимоий, иқтисодий ва мамлакат сиёсий ҳаётини баҳолашга қаратилган ҳар қандай халқаро рейтинг кўрсаткичлари мамлакатнинг жаҳон хўжалигидаги рақобатбардошлигини белгилашда муҳим аҳамият касб этади. Шу жумладан, мактаб ўқувчиларининг креатив фикрлашини баҳолашга йўналтирилган PISA халқаро рейтинги ҳам мамлакатда етишиб чиқаётган ёш кадрларнинг жаҳон бозоридаги рақобатбардошлигига ва баҳосига катта таъсир кўрсатади;
Тадқиқотларга тайёргарлик кўриш жараёнида мактаб таълим тизимини замонавий стандартларига мослаштиришни ва ўқувчиларнинг ижодий ёндашув қобилиятини ривожланади;
Ижодкорлик мураккаб ва кўп ўлчовли тузилиш бўлиб, уни аниқ ва консенсуал тарзда аниқлашни қийинлаштиради. Аммо шуни таъкидлаш мумкинки, ижодкорликни ўрганишда мавжуд бўлган турли хил ёндашувлар ижодкорликнинг бир-бирини тўлдирувчи кўринишини таъминлайди ва келажакдаги тадқиқотлар учун кўпроқ ёритиб беради, бу эса ижодий ва инсон тафаккурида иштирок этадиган психик жараёнлар ва механизмларни ҳамда омилларни кашф этишга хизмат қилади;
Мактаб ўқувчилари ўртасида креатив фикрлашнин ривожланиши мамлакатда инновацион тадқиқотларнинг, илмий-техник фаолиятнинг ривожланишида муҳим муҳим аҳамият касб этади.
Фойдаланилган адабиётлар
Hennessey, B. and T. Amabile (2010), “Creativity”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 569-598.
OECD (2010), The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow, OECD.
PISA-шок нима? У Ўзбекистонда ҳам рўй бериши мумкинми? https://xs.uz/uzkr/post/pisa-shok-nima-u-ozbekistonda-ham-roj-berishi-mumkinmi
OECD (2017), PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Strategic Advisory Group Report, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/PISA/ GB(2017)19/en/pdf (accessed on 26 March 2018).
Begetto, R. (2010), “Creativity in the classroom”, in Kaufman, J. and R. Sternberg (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity.
Plucker, J., R. Begetto and G. Dow (2004), “Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 39/2, pp. 83-96.
Smith, J. and L. Smith (2010), “Educational creativity”, in Kaufman, J. and R. Sternberg (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.016.
Torrance, E. (1959), “Current research on the nature of creative talent.”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 6/4, pp. 309-316, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0042285.
Spencer, E. and B. Lucas (2018), Understanding the role of creative self-efficacy in youth social action, University of Winchester.
Long, H. and J. Plucker (2015), “Assessing creative thinking: practical applications”, in Wegerif, R., L. Li and J. Kaufman (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Teaching Thinking, Routledge, New York.
Barbot, B., T. Lubart and M. Besançon (2016), ““Peaks, Slumps, and Bumps”: Individual Differences in the Development of Creativity in Children and Adolescents”, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cad.20152.
Barbot, B. and B. Heuser (2017), “Creativity and Identity Formation in Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective”, in The Creative Self, Elsevier, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-012-809790-8.00005-4.
Gajda, A., M. Karwowski and R. Begetto (2017), “Creativity and academic achievement: A metaanalysis.”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 109/2, pp. 269-299, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ edu0000133.
Torrance, E. P. (1981). Predicting the creativity of elementary school children (1958 80)and the teacher who "made a difference." Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 55-62.
Эдвард де Боно. Гениально! Инструменты решения креативных задач = Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas (1992) ISBN 0-00-255143-8 – A summation of many of De Bono’s ideas on creativity. — М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2015. — 381 с. — ISBN 978-5961448719.
Lucas, B. (2016), “A five-dimensional model of creativity and its assessment in schools”, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 29/4, pp. 278-290, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1 209206.
Amabile, T. (1983), “The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 45/2, pp. 357-376, http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
Sternberg, R. and T. Lubart (1991), “An investment theory of creativity and its development”, Human Development, Vol. 34/1, pp. 1-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000277029.
Sternberg, R. (2006), “The nature of creativity”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 18/1, pp. 87-98, https://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY2013/cs7601_spring/papers/Sternberg_Nature-ofcreativity.pdf.
PISA is the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Ismailov va boshqalar. Ta’lim va ko‘nikmalarni rivojlantirish direksiyasi xalqaro o‘quvchilarni baholash dasturi//PISA 2022 o‘quvchilarning kreativ fiklashlarini baholash bo‘yicha qo‘llanma//Тошкент-2021.
Do'stlaringiz bilan baham: |