Yangi o’zbekistonning umidli yoshlari” 1(3)-son

Ключевые слова:
интеграция, модернизация, ООН, универсализация, 
реалисты и межгосударственные политики, результат. 
Abstract:
This article deals with the different aspects of integration and 
international cooperation, the importance of international cooperation in intercultural 
universalization today. 
Key words:
Integration, modernization, the United Nations, universalization, 
realists and intergovernmental politicians, result. 
The success of EU integration in the second half of the last century not only linked 
scientific and ideological perspectives on integration with practical experience, but also 
provided a number of new perspectives on integration theory. 
In this regard, the basic definitions of "integration - the process of voluntary 
unification, interaction of national economies in order to obtain qualitatively new 
conditions and expand the opportunities for development of the country" not in sync 
until. 
In the lexical sense, the legal interpretation of the term, which means "the result 
of a process or action that produces a whole, uniting, uniting, joining into a whole," is 
much more complex and differs from that of political science and philosophy. In 
particular, the definition of "interstate political integration - the process of establishing 
new institutions that assimilate the sovereign rights of national political bodies" can be 
found only in political dictionaries. 

---

18 
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
(CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda. 
“YANGI O’ZBEKISTONNING UMIDLI YOSHLARI” 1(3)-SON 
2022-YIL 28-APREL 
There are different approaches to this term in the field of international law. In the 
second half of the twentieth century, as a result of the intensification of international 
relations, interstate borders were recognized only as an instrument of legal security of 
states, and at a time when economic development began to be hampered, diversity of 
approaches may have emerged. 
When it comes to cross-border relations, it is clear that integration is linked to 
regional criteria. This is one of the main signs of regional integration. 
At this point, the concept of "region" itself needs to be clarified. In describing it, 
most scholars rely on three criteria put forward by Bruce Rasset. These are 
geographical proximity and individuality, interdependence and commonality. 
Geographical proximity seems to have lost some of its importance in recent years due 
to the development of science and technology in the development of transport links. 
YA, small mountains and rivers are no longer able to define the boundaries of any 
region. However, this factor did not significantly affect the political and cultural 
boundaries within the region. The thin "Berlin Wall" that until recently separated the 
two political systems is a clear proof of this. Interdependence is often referred to as 
economic interdependence. The internal and external trade and economic relations of 
the countries of the region: the movement of raw materials, goods, technologies and 
labor from one side to another are the main indicators that determine the degree of 
interdependence. 
The third criterion that defines a region as a region is the commonality of the 
region. Commonality can be linguistic, religious, ethnic, historical. It can also be 
reflected in the way of life of nations, in the political system of countries, in the levels 
of economic development. Only the historical circumstances of a particular period can 
determine which of them is primary. These criteria, which define the region, are 
currently the main factors of regional integration. However, many scientific sources do 
not focus on regional integration, but on the process of integrated regionalization. This 
analysis is also reasonable: it is only natural that any integration should take root 
between two or more states and gradually cover or regionalize the entire region. It is 
better to look at the process of regional integration only as a process that has already 
reached a partial regional scale. In this sense, it is necessary to distinguish between the 
concepts of integrated regionalization and regional integration. 
The second key aspect of integration is its economic nature. There is no example 
of "political integration" in any part of the world. Political unification or interstate 
integration is still a level of cooperation (even within the European Union). Therefore, 
the following is an idea of economic regionalization (or economic regionalism), which 
can grow to the level of regional integration. Economic regionalization, which has not 
yet reached the level of integration, usually remains within the framework of 
international economic cooperation. Cooperation regionalism serves to stimulate 

---

19 
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
(CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda. 
“YANGI O’ZBEKISTONNING UMIDLI YOSHLARI” 1(3)-SON 
2022-YIL 28-APREL 
production and trade between states without compromising their sovereignty. An 
example is the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), founded in 967 and 
uniting countries such as China and Japan. Although plans to establish a free trade area 
within the organization have not been implemented, significant institutional progress 
has been made in monitoring the implementation of agreements by the early 1990s. 
In contrast, integrated regionalism primarily reflects the essence of economic 
federalism and creates a single internal market in the relevant space. The single 
domestic market, in turn, requires a legal and political combination that allows for the 
free movement of production and goods, individuals, services and capital. Such 
harmonization will be achieved as a result of the transfer of some of their powers to the 
Economic Integration Authority. In short, collaborative regionalism is fundamentally 
different from integrated regionalism. Regardless of the level of regionalization, it is 
really about the difference between the concepts of cooperation and integration. 
Collaboration is the joint action and practice of several entities based on a common 
consensus on a specific common goal and ways to achieve it, as opposed to operating 
separately on the basis of competition rules. 
Integration, unlike international cooperation, is a legal event that has clear legal 
consequences and is guaranteed on the condition of unification of legal norms that are 
binding on all. The unification of legal norms and through them the whole legal system 
is achieved through the harmonization of national legislation. 
Unless the distinction between integration and cooperation is understood, the 
complex nature of any integration will remain obscure. So, first of all, we need to know 
the difference between integration and cooperation. 
First, cooperation can be between countries anywhere in the world. Integration 
requires territorial proximity, proximity, or regional integrity. 
Second, cooperation can be established in all spheres of economic and socio-
political life, and integration is mainly in the economic sphere. 
Third, cooperation will only lead to the liberalization of foreign economic and 
trade relations between states, and without deep economic structural changes. In other 
words, the previous economic institutions will remain in place. Integration, on the other 
hand, focuses on the creation of new economic institutions and integrated economic 
zones. 
Fourth, although cooperation leads to the strengthening and deepening of 
interstate economic, socio-political and cultural ties, there is no need for a separate 
administrative apparatus. The integration process requires the establishment of 
common bodies that enact, enforce and oversee laws that are binding on all. 
Finally, fifthly, cooperation does not seriously interfere with the absolute 
sovereignty of states, is carried out through mutual concessions and is governed by the 
simplest legal mechanisms. In integration, most of the sovereign rights of states are 

---

20 
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
(CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda. 
“YANGI O’ZBEKISTONNING UMIDLI YOSHLARI” 1(3)-SON 
2022-YIL 28-APREL 
transferred to a third party (an organization, not another state). The division of powers 
between central governments, between member states, between member states and 
general institutions creates a complex legal framework. 
In short, cooperation is more about common interests, and integration is about 
matching goals. Deep and mutually trusting cooperation between countries opens the 
way to a new social phenomenon - integration, which is a qualitatively high stage of 
cooperation. The coherence and interdependence of the process of international 
cooperation and integration sometimes makes it difficult to distinguish between the 
two. While some sources see integration as a form of collaboration, it is sometimes 
approached from an institutional perspective. For example, “integration, which is the 
fruit of modern civilizational development, is one of the manifestations of cooperation 
between states today. It means the existence of superior institutional systems that 
ensure the smooth development of the participating states, as well as the viability of 
intergovernmental organizations in the interests of their participants. " In such cases, 
the most important legal distinction between cooperation and integration is the legal 
distinction. In this regard, it is better to refer to the definition given by the German 
lawyer Gilbert Gornig: "Integration means the creation of general institutions that 
restrict national parliaments and issue secondary legal acts that are binding not only on 
participating states but also on every citizen." No matter how many different definitions 
of integration, there are some things that make them common. This means that any 
integration will require territorial integrity or proximity, binding and unified legal rules 
that are binding on all, and an institutional system that enforces and monitors these 
rules. Not all of these requirements may arise at once. It depends on the stage or form 
of integration.
The integration process in the Central Asian region is also progressing slowly. On 
January 0, 1999, the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Republic of Kazakhstan signed 
an agreement on the establishment of a free economic zone. On April 0, 1999, an 
agreement was signed between Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan on the 
establishment of a free economic zone. As a result of Tajikistan's accession to the treaty 
in March 998, the Central Asian Economic Community was established on July 7, 998. 
On February 8, 00, the community was transformed into the Central Asian Cooperation 
Organization (CACO). At the Dushanbe summit of the organization in October 00, 
Russia was accepted as an equal member of the OIC. 
Within the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), a Customs Union was 
established in January 996 between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, which was later 
joined by Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. On its basis, the Eurasian Economic Community 
(EurAsEC) was established on October 0, 000, and a year later, the creation of a free 
economic space within this community began. 

---

21 
CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES
(CARJIS) ilmiy jurnali bilan hamkorlikda. 
“YANGI O’ZBEKISTONNING UMIDLI YOSHLARI” 1(3)-SON 
2022-YIL 28-APREL