Xalqaro munosabatlar

resources’ (money, knowledge, personnel, weapons, reputation, etc.)]; episodic power [in terms of
achieving outcomes in social relations (e.g. influence on a certain decision)]; capabilities/power in
organizational terms (organizations, resources, rules, bargaining); capabilities/power in discursive
terms (knowledge, story lines, discourses, deliberation); transitive power [conflict-oriented zero-sum
games (‘A achieves something at the cost of B’)]; intransitive power [social integration and collective
outcomes (‘A and B achieving something together’)]; situate power at the level of the acting agent
(‘the swimming fish’); capabilities/power at the level of structures (‘the water putting pressure on the
fish’). Actors of IR (groups of interest in IR): states, international intergovernmental organizations,
international non-governmental organizations, transnational corporations, international funds, cities
(mega), territories / regions, social movements and activists, universities, international terrorist and
extremist groups, global media (international media agencies), Diaspora, «network communities»,
etc. [state, sub-state, non-state and supranational actors].
79. TASK – 2. Choose any actor from the list and provide relevant data/examples/cases to actor’s use of
power according to given types of power. [Excerpted from Arts Bas. Working Paper. Non-state actors
in global governance: Three faces of power // Preprints aus der Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der
Gemeinschaftsgüter, No. 2003/4] POWER (of actors): dispositional power [in terms of ‘having
resources’ (money, knowledge, personnel, weapons, reputation, etc.)]; episodic power [in terms of
achieving outcomes in social relations (e.g. influence on a certain decision)]; capabilities/power in
organizational terms (organizations, resources, rules, bargaining); capabilities/power in discursive