Women-writes in english literature

Conclusion
In my conclusion, I have understood well writing of women.They can write very the best master piece.I believe in their.Because they are very the best create people. W.Shakespeare said perfectly creativenist :they were the best prettiness of nature,not only the great Shakespeare represents the Renaissance literature of England - he is surrounded by Edmund Spenser, John Lily, Robert Green, Christopher Marlowe, Francis Bacon and other outstanding writers. The literature of the English Renaissance developed after the new literatures of Italy, Germany, France, Spain - it is the latest of them. It reached maturity in the second half of the 16th century, and reached its highest expression in the tragedies of Shakespeare at the beginning of the 17th century, when humanism, a new direction in the spiritual life of Western and Central Europe that arose in the transitional era and inspired spiritual development, turned out to be in a state of acute crisis.
Shakespeare found English drama and theater at its peak. He followed the already established drama and theatrical tradition. A string of Shakespearean characters, Shakespearean plots are for the most part traditional, as are many "Shakespearean" devices. When, for example, Shakespeare's gravediggers sang, or when the jesters appeared after the murder, he did not invent, he used the traditional method. Shakespeare borrowed from the old tradition and, especially from his contemporaries, an unusually large amount. In Shakespeare's time, they wrote almost like Shakespeare around, and Shakespeare appeared. Such is the pattern: the giant rises on the prepared literary soil - in different eras and in different countries, the same situation is found. An outstanding contemporary of Shakespeare, “amazing Ben”, playwright Ben Jonson, in a poetic preface to the publication of the collected works of Shakespeare in 1623, accurately defined the historical position of Shakespeare: he rises above everyone, stands apart, but is also connected with everyone, he is “the soul century" and will be glorious at all times.
There is no one equal to Shakespeare in the creative greatness, significance and vitality of his legacy in the literary history of England. A national genius, Shakespeare belongs to the geniuses of world literature, to a small number of writers who have had and are having a beneficial effect on the development of other national literatures and on the spiritual culture of the world.
There is not a single significant English writer who is not aware of the creative and spiritual greatness of Shakespeare. He laid down or approved the beginnings of that tradition of English literature, which there is every reason to call great, by virtue of the vitality it has shown and the achievements gained on its basis. The fearlessness of the aesthetic analysis of social and psychological contradictions, the strict demand for artistic truth, the irreconcilable passion in exposing everything that corrupts society and man, the assertion of the dignity of man, the strength of his mind, will, his moral potentialities, unshakable faith in the possibility of his harmonious development and justice ¬vogo social order - this is the reality and the main precepts of this tradition.
The true problem of Hamlet's character is not connected with his slowness, but with the fact that, living in a world where evil reigns, he himself is every moment in danger of being exposed to a general infection. Even when he is about to commit an act of just retribution, he also commits unjustified cruelties along the way.
How to remain pure in an environment where evil is inevitable is one of the great universal problems that arise in tragedy. A careful analysis shows that, from the point of view of dogmatic morality, Hamlet is far from being without sin. But just as the factual innocence of Gertrude does not make her really pure, so the factual guilt of Hamlet does not in the least stain his pure moral character. This is one of those paradoxes of life that requires an insight into the essence of characters and circumstances, such as Shakespeare possessed.
Hamlet's life is tragic not only because he is surrounded by a mass of evil and does not know how to fight it, but also because the ideal of true humanity is always in front of him, and he feels that he himself is far from it. This is the tragedy of the greatest souls, the tragedy of people of the greatest honesty and exactingness towards themselves. No one is as merciless in self-esteem as Hamlet. All other characters of the tragedy, into whose inner world Shakespeare allowed us, are always busy with self-justification. Only Hamlet indulges in self-accusations. This can be regarded as a manifestation of weakness, considering that human dignity suffers from such self-abasement. This is the argument of those who do not believe in the necessity of complete truth. But Hamlet cannot live without this complete truth. And the most beautiful thing about him is that in his pursuit of truth, he spares himself least of all. This is how he rises above all the other characters in the tragedy. But not only over them. He became for the whole world an image of a man of great conscience, a seeker of truth and a fighter for justice.