Westgate Priority Action Group

Westgate Priority Action Group (Westgate PAG)

Notes of meeting held on Thursday 22^nd September 2005 Venue: Second Floor, 75 – 81 Eastgate Street, Gloucester

Present:

Mike Jesnick Andrew Maliphant Jan Kirby Marilyn Jennings Pat Dabbs Denise Hill Judith Morris Jill Salvin Pat Diskett Ian Ellis Martin Wallace Ginny Davies

MJ AM JK MJe PD DH JM JS PDi IE MW

University of Gloucestershire (Chair) Gloucester City Council Gloucester City Council Gloucestershire County Council Crime & Disorder Reduction Partnership Jobcentre Plus Gloucestershire Partnership NHS Trust West Gloucestershire PCT West Gloucestershire PCT Furniture Recycling Project Gloucester City Council West Gloucestershire PCT (In Attendance)

Apologies:

Clare Parrack Sarah Scott Fran Tolond Paul James Jim Austin Shahina Bhaiyat Richard Dennery Mick Thorpe

Gloucestershire County Council West Gloucestershire PCT City Centre Churches Gloucester City Council ACET Gloucester Youth Movement Central Gloucester Initiative Gloucester City Council

1.	Notes of meeting held Wednesday 20^th July 2005
	The notes of the previous meeting were agreed as a true record.
2.	Matters arising
	AM had circulated a “Matters arising” report to the group prior to the meeting:
	Westgate Neighbourhood Centre WM Enterprise Consultants from Birmingham have interviewed 400 local residents and 90 firms as part of the detailed feasibility study into the make-up of the proposed Centre. There will be a presentation of options for the centre on October 18^th and the final report is due at the end of November. URC Regeneration Framework Presentations from four short-listed consultants were completed on 12^th and 16^th September and the appointed firm will be announced shortly. The Regeneration Framework is due to be completed by March 2006, and help will be requested with the first stage, a socio-economic survey of Gloucester city centre (Westgate ward). Visit to Birmingham The study visit to see the regeneration of Birmingham city centre on Monday 25^th July was very successful. Thirty people came along, and a full report on the day is attached. Housing Needs Survey: The report was circulated. Still to Action: Links to community enterprises to be made via Gloucester Centre for Voluntary Services Newsletter, Action: AM. URC Letter: MJ wrote to Chris Oldershaw, but has only had a brief verbal response. URC management processes were due to be discussed at the URC board on 25^th August, but MJ has not heard back from anyone yet. For information the URC will be moving to 13/15 Ladybellegate Street by Christmas. IE reported he will be joining the Community Forum as part of the link to the URC’s new Regeneration Framework. AM gave an update on what the Regeneration Framework consultants, Terence O’Rourke will be looking at over the next 6 months. AM has been in talks with Sally Pickering, who is on the URC Board, regarding a briefing paper for the LSP around working with the consultants. AM will circulate the draft paper to the Chair and Vice Chair for comments, and will happily circulate it to other group members on request. Action: AM Visit to Birmingham: AM gave a brief talk about the visit to Birmingham, a full report of the day was circulated to the group. Key points of particular relevance to Gloucester: Birmingham agreed clear priorities based on the city’s key feature (a central UK location) and stuck to them over many years The City Council was prepared to break the physical mould of the city, and sold sites to pay for improving infrastructure £5M per annum put into regeneration rather than improving council services, but it was essential to attract and involve the private sector Spaces between buildings were seen as very important. An improved environment is more expensive to maintain, but the private sector was given some responsibility for that through planning agreements The Broad Street business improvement district (BID) has been set up to do some maintenance but also to promote the area Brindley Place, a site assembled by the public sector and developed privately, is a showcase mixed-use development now used as a benchmark for all new proposals Pedestrian access across the city centre was seen as vital. One outcome has been high value city centre flats without car parking Public transport and the gateways to the city need a lot of work The regeneration has not been successful at bringing new jobs into the city, there has been local growth, with retail coming in late Public investment in the arts has helped raise the profile of the city e.g. supporting Simon Rattle as an “ambassador for Birmingham” A range of innovative city centre management techniques have been used, combining events and attractions with control of crime and the environment The group discussed the visit and impressions they had from the visit to Birmingham. JK commented that employment and housing prospects had not been improved - £14M of housing money had been spent on the ICC conference centre - and questioned the amount of social regeneration achieved. MW wondered what is Gloucester’s unique selling point, and asked what might bring economic development to Gloucester. The group felt local people should be asked about their priorities, and the URC about what would be a measure of their success. Skills training was discussed around getting people back to work – JM mentioned that without a good skills base new developers would bring in workers from outside. DH offered to look at the skills people would like training in when applying for Jobseekers Allowance, if possible to break these down, on the understanding the information is based on asking the people applying for Jobseekers Allowance what they would like to do, rather than what skills they already have. Action: DH.
3.	Priority 2: collect and share information about local needs
	AM mentioned that some work has been carried out around the needs and demands for the new Neighbourhood Centre. Discussion followed around learning needs for local residents, for example, basic skills, literature skills, and computer and technical courses. It was mentioned that some courses were available in the city, more than likely at Gloscat. However some people are unable to attend Gloscat for courses due to locality and personal circumstances. For example, it is up to employers if they allowed their employees to tap into these resources, especially if funding isn’t available and companies have to pay for training themselves. IE reported that deliveries into Westgate ward from the Furniture Recycling Project were up from 14% of the total to 18%. Westgate is the second highest user of reconditioned furniture after Barton, showing there are more people in need there than elsewhere in the city. Barton, Westgate and Matson together make up 50% of furniture deliveries.
4.	Priority 3: (new) opportunities to address the needs identified
	DH reported a jobs fair is being held for the Barton, Tredworth and White City area in January 2006. There is also a jobs fair being held at Gloucester Rugby Club on 20^th October. The target is to get people back to work, and the jobs fairs will include real employers offering real jobs. DH asked if anyone had outlets for jobs fair posters, and agreed to send a quantity to AM for distribution. Action: DH/AM
5	Priority 4: work together to achieve the mission
	AM has written a paper for the LSP concerning the Learning Skills Council money and linking training to new jobs. The model being used is one from Greenwich, London.
6	Priority 1: ensure that the needs of the people of Westgate are properly taken into account
	Health, Westgate Health Needs Assessment: PDi gave a talk on the Westgate Health Needs Assessment, explaining the methodology behind how the work was carried out. A workshop had been held on the 6^th September to discuss the preliminary findings of the report. PDi mentioned that originally it was hoped that between 25 – 30 interviews with local residents would be carried out, unfortunately, following numerous follow ups, it has only been possible to interview 12 residents. (This is to be revisited to see if any more residents can be identified to interview). 24 Key informants from the voluntary and community sector were interviewed as well as 4 focus groups from hard to reach areas such as the homeless, older people, youth and drug misuse persons. PDi mentioned that the Westgate ward not only incorporates areas of deprivation but also has pockets of affluence within its boundaries, for example Hempsted is a more affluent area and parts of the docks, Brunswick square area are also fairly affluent compared to Cromwell or Wellington Streets. In the population profile for Westgate men exceed women. Deprivation was measured in three separate areas called super output areas which cover Hempsted, lower Westgate, and the Gloucester Park area. In the reported life expectancy for men, the national PSA target for 2010 is to increase life expectancy for men to 78.6 years old and women 82.5 years old, the figures currently for the Westgate area are 69.7 years old for men and 84.6 years old for women. It is unclear why women are living to a longer age in the Westgate area, it is thought that there is some discrepancy in the way in which the information has been reported. For example an elderly lady registered in the Westgate area is moved to a nursing home in Brockworth, then dies, so the death is registered in Brockworth and not Westgate. Some more work will need to be completed to clarify the data. Smoking is expected to be one of the key health issues that lead back to deprivation. There will be recommendations from the September workshop, and the PCT should come back at a later time to discuss the next steps with the group. AM mentioned that one common theme that came out of the September workshop was to work together, including the possibility for joint staff appointments. The PCT would also make contact with the specialist advisers at Jobcentre Plus dealing with incapacity benefit. Action: Primary Care Trust One interesting finding was regarding education attainment. Normally with high levels of unemployment and high levels of deprivation you would expect lower levels of education attainment, however, this is not the case in the Westgate area. One potential cause is multi-occupational dwellings with university students, this will need to be reinvestigated. It was mentioned that there was concern that the waiting time for drug users who were wishing to seek help was long and if you were an offender the time was shortened. PD and PDi explained that the PCT are aware that if you are in the Criminal Justice System then access to treatment is quicker. As the PCT have now become a responsible authority to the Crime Disorder and Reduction Partnership it has made investment in drug treatment services in order to bring down the waiting times for being seen. Eighteen months ago the waiting time for an offender was 6 months, this has been reduced dramatically to no waiting time. The PCT is aware this has had some knock on effect to treating those wishing to come off drugs that are not part of the criminal justice system, and this is being assessed. PD explained that since the rapid access to drug treatment has been in existence crime rates especially for theft appear to have fallen, this information has been ascertained from the crime statistics available to the Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership. PDi also mentioned there is currently a Community Counts drug treatment project taking place in the Barton & Tredworth area that has strong links with the local GP, and this project will be evaluated shortly. Crime & Disorder Reduction Strategy PD gave a talk on the Gloucester Crime Reduction Strategy 2005 – 2008. The Crime Reduction Strategy aims to reduce crime across the city. The main actions which will affect the Westgate area are: Nightsafe Campaign to continue – Challenge 21 to reduce under age drinking, launched 1^st September 2005. Challenge 21 will be included as a condition in all new licenses granted under the new legislation – further poster using Nightsafe format with a Christmas message, to be produced for November 24^th to coincide with new licensing laws and start of Christmas celebrations – repeat of distribution of lollipops to clubbers on leaving nightclubs in city centre over Christmas and New Year period – further campaign planned for the new year Lighting at GL1 to remain on until 4am (possible until 7am) to improve safety Consideration to be given as part of the Evening Economy Strategy to increase toilet facilities in the city centre at night Consideration to be given as part of the Evening Economy Strategy to the rapid cleaning of city centre streets in early hours (possible street cleaning to continue through the evenings). Also to put pressure on food take away businesses to clean the area surrounding their premises at close of business each day (in early hours of morning) Training to be provided for shops and city centre by means of leaflet for staff or training seminar (working with Central Gloucester Initiative) Several different drug and alcohol interventions are supported by the CDRP – Gloucestershire Drug and Alcohol Services Community Development Worker working with drug users and supporting their families – Alcohol Arrest Referral Scheme – Gloucestershire Reintegration Service – Gloucester Emergency Accommodation Resource (GEAR) day centre Discussions took place around the ‘fear of crime’ which is more of an issue for residents in the Westgate area than crimes reportedly carried out. PD mentioned that an exhibit for promoting crime prevention was to be held in the Eastgate Shopping Centre. Community Services: Will be put on the agenda for discussion at the next meeting.
7.	Any Other Business
	A discussion around the demand for Child Care Services within the new Neighbourhood Centre took place. It was agreed this discussion would be taken to the Neighbourhood Centre Board meeting. Action: AM
8	Dates of Future Meetings: Open Spaces, Street Care and Culture, Friday 28^th October 2005, 10am – Noon, Montpellier Suite, Wootton Lawn Hospital, Horton Road, Gloucester.